Diddy team admits to violence, but not sex trafficking. Will the jury see a difference?New Foto - Diddy team admits to violence, but not sex trafficking. Will the jury see a difference?

NEW YORK ―Video evidenceshowsSean "Diddy" Combskicking and dragging his ex-girlfriend in a hotel hallway as she was trying to leave. But some defense lawyers still believe there's a way Combs could win hissex-trafficking trial: Admit you committed domestic violence, but remind jurors you're not charged with that crime. "The defense should be they've overcharged the guy. They're charging him with sex trafficking, when they should have charged him with domestic violence," lawyer and trial consultant Robert Hirschhorn tells USA TODAY ahead of the trial. Sure enough, Combs' defense lawyer Teny Geragossaid in her opening statementthat her team didn't plan to deny Combs' personal responsibility for domestic violence, but did plan to vigorously fight the trafficking charges. "Domestic violence is not sex trafficking," Geragos said. "I want to say it again. Domestic violence is not sex trafficking." Since the onset of the trial on May 5, Combs' defense team has tried to establish that people who participated in "freak offs" – in which Combs would, according to testimony, direct and sometimes film sex performances between women and male sex workers – did so willingly. That includes presenting texts to suggestCasandra "Cassie" Ventura Fine, the ex-girlfriend Combs assaulted in the hotel video, consented to "freak offs." "I don't want to freak off for our last time. I want it to be the first time for the rest of our lives," Ventura Finetexted Combs in 2012, according to a message his defense has shown to jurors. (The prosecution has shown jurors a different part of the same exchange in which Ventura Fine texted, "I don't wanna do one last time. I don't want to at all.") The strategy may be the best way for Combs to deal with video evidence and testimony from numerous witnesses on domestic violence. But the approach is also akin to threading a needle, according to some litigators who have prosecuted sex-trafficking cases. That's because sex trafficking involves compelling someone to participate in a commercial sex act through force, fraud, or coercion. If Combs admits he used physical violence in his relationship with Ventura Fine, some jurors could believe he's admitting he forced her into the "freak offs." "Domestic violence goes to the heart of that question," says Moira Penza, a litigator who in 2019 successfully prosecuted the so-calledNXIVM "sex cult"leaderKeith Ranierefor sex trafficking and racketeering – two charges Combs now faces. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges in the federal criminal trial. "If somebody is being beaten before or after sexual encounters, and knows that that is just a consistent part of their relationship, that really extinguishes any concept of consent and goes right to this element of, 'Was the commercial sex compelled through force, fraud or coercion?'" Penza tells USA TODAY. Combs' defense team didn't respond to a request for comment on whether it believes it is walking a tightrope in conceding domestic violence while denying he trafficked anyone. But it has tried to demonstrate that alleged victims had agency. "They're giving the jury an option that falls below sex trafficking, but still allows them to condemn Mr. Combs for his use of force that they know the government has evidence of," Hugh Sandler, a lawyer who has litigated human trafficking and racketeering, tells USA TODAY. It's possible the defense team didn't think it had any choice but to admit Combs abused Ventura Fine. In about a month, the jury has seenmyriad photos of injuriesVentura Fine says she suffered at Combs' hands and heard numerous witnesses testify that they personally witnessed Combs physically attack her. Combs' former stylistDeonte Nash, for instance, testified that Combs once threw Ventura Fine's head against a bed frame, causing a gash above her eye. Ventura Fine's former best friend,Kerry Morgan, said she saw Combs drag Ventura Fine down a 50-yard hallway before pushing her down, where she hit her head on a brick. Daniel Phillip, a male stripper who said he was paid for sex acts involving Combs and Ventura Fine, testified that he witnessed Combsthrow a liquor bottle in Ventura Fine's directionand drag her by her hair into a bedroom after she asked him to "hold on one second" when he called for her. The defense could still win an acquittal or a hung jury on the sex trafficking charges by distinguishing between domestic violence and sex trafficking, according to Mitchell Epner, a former New Jersey federal prosecutor who was the lead attorney in sex-trafficking and involuntary-servitude cases. "But it is really putting the jurors to the test of their oath to ask them to split hairs in the way that the defense is asking them to," Epner says. Litigators will tell you that trust with jurors can make or break a trial. The desire to win that trust may have driven the defense team's decision to admit guilt – just not to the charges. His lawyers knew going into the trial that jurors would hear graphic testimony of violence and "freak offs" that Ventura Fine says were only for Combs' pleasure. At one "freak off," Ventura Fine described, Combs directed an escort to urinate on her to the point that she was choking. "I thought that it was obvious that I didn't want to do it," she testified. "The most important thing you have as a trial lawyer is your credibility," Penza says. "I thought that the defense did as strong a job as you can given the facts that they have stacked against them." But even if the defense strategy was logical, that doesn't mean it's not risky. The prosecution already called one expert witness to the stand, clinical psychologistDawn Hughes, who described domestic violence as behavior that functions to exert control over a victim. "When we are hit, harmed, beat up … we feel scared," Hughes said. In eliciting that testimony, prosecutors may have wanted to link Combs' violent behavior with the ultimate charge: that he used that violence to compel Ventura Fine and others to participate in "freak offs." Having admitted to one part of that prosecution narrative, the defense is now tasked with severing its link to the wider charges. Can it thread that needle? Epner thinks it's possible, but also an uphill battle. "It may be asking too much of jurors to ask them to conclude that yes, Sean Combs is a drug-addicted, violent, sexual aggressor, but he didn't commit this offense because here there was consent," Epner says. Aysha Bagchi covers the Department of Justice for USA TODAY. She is an attorney, Harvard Law graduate, and Rhodes Scholar.You can follow her on X and Bluesky at @AyshaBagchi. If you are a survivor of sexual assault,RAINNoffers support through the National Sexual Assault Hotline at 800.656.HOPE (4673) andHotline.RAINN.organd en EspañolRAINN.org/es. If you or someone you know is a victim of domestic violence, call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 or text "START" to 88788. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Diddy trial defense is tricky. Will jury see sex trafficking?

Diddy team admits to violence, but not sex trafficking. Will the jury see a difference?

Diddy team admits to violence, but not sex trafficking. Will the jury see a difference? NEW YORK ―Video evidenceshowsSean "Diddy" ...
Parker Posey Praises "White Lotus" Creator Mike White 'for Believing in a Middle Aged Woman' in Speech at 2025 Gotham Awards

Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Parker Posey attended the 2025 Gotham TV Awards in New York on Monday, June 2 The actress, 56, was honored with the Legend Tribute for her role inThe White Lotus "Thank you, Mike White, for writing this character for me," she said in her acceptance speech Parker Poseyis feeling grateful for her role inThe White Lotus! On Monday, June 2, the actress, 56, was honored with the Legend Tribute at the2025 Gotham TV Awards, held at Cipriani Wall Street in New York. In her acceptance speech, she thanked the fans of the hit HBO show for carrying on the character's legacy — specifically, her southern drawl when she says "Piper, no!" "You know what this award says to me, which makes me so happy?" Posey said in her acceptance speech. "To those out there on the internet world who made things on YouTube, who put things on social media, who imitated me, who had fun in the backyard, who made art, whether it was good or bad, they entertained each other and themselves. The actress added, "Thank you, Mike White, for writing this character for me, for believing in a middle aged woman, and believing in a legend." Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty She concluded her speech with a call to action, telling audience members, "Let's keep the arts alive! Let's turn this business into entertainment that everyone can love, that old people, and young people, and even babies laugh at." Posey played Victoria Ratliff, a wealthy North Carolina wife and mother of three inThe White Lotus. Her southern drawl and uniquely humorous line delivery earned her virality amid a legion of new fans online, who often shared videos lip synching or imitating her notable lines from the show's third season. Michael Buckner/Variety via Getty Following her Legend Tribute win, Posey is set to star inWild Horse NineoppositeThe White Lotusco-star Sam Rockwell. "I just, I love him. I remember the first time I saw Sam Rockwell smoking in a theater by a telephone booth," Posey exclusively told PEOPLE at the Gotham TV Awards. Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "You can't do that anymore and there are no telephone booths anymore in a theater, you know, and he was auditioning for something and he's looking at his lines, so I have known him for a long, long time," she said. Read the original article onPeople

Parker Posey Praises “White Lotus” Creator Mike White 'for Believing in a Middle Aged Woman’ in Speech at 2025 Gotham Awards

Parker Posey Praises "White Lotus" Creator Mike White 'for Believing in a Middle Aged Woman' in Speech at 2025 Gotham Awar...
Zelenskiy aides visit US as Ukraine strikes Russian-held territoryNew Foto - Zelenskiy aides visit US as Ukraine strikes Russian-held territory

By Olena Harmash and Aleksandar Vasovic KYIV (Reuters) -Senior Ukrainian officials visited Washington on Tuesday seeking U.S. support against Russia, as Kyiv showed its ability to fight on by setting off an explosive device under a bridge that has become a symbol of the Kremlin's claims on Ukrainian territory. A day after talks in Istanbul that made little progress towards ending Russia's war in Ukraine, Kyiv launched what appeared to be one of its biggest waves of coordinated attacks of the conflict. Ukraine's SBU security service said it had hit a road and rail bridge that links Russia and Crimea below the water level with explosives. The extent of any damage was not clear but there were no immediate signs of traffic disruption. The bridge is a flagship project for Russian President Vladimir Putin, built after he annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, in a precursor to the latest conflict. Meanwhile, Ukrainian drones and shelling targeting the southeastern Zaporizhzhia region and the Kherson region in the south damaged electricity substations, leaving at least 700,000 people without power, Russia-installed officials said. Underlining the gulf between the two sides after more than three years of war, the Kremlin said work on trying to reach a peace settlement was extraordinarily complex and that it would be wrong to expect any imminent decisions. Andriy Yermak, chief of staff to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, arrived in the United States along with Deputy Prime Minister Yuliia Svrydenko. Ukraine says Moscow is stalling the peace talks and Yermak signalled that he would press Ukrainian demands for tougher sanctions on Russia. "We will actively promote issues that are important for Ukraine. Our agenda is rather comprehensive," Yermak said on the Telegram app after arriving in Washington. "We plan to talk about defence support and the situation on the battlefield, strengthening sanctions against Russia." Yermak said the officials would also discuss a deal that gives the U.S. preferential access to new Ukrainian mineral projects and sets up an investment fund that could be used for the reconstruction of Ukraine. DRONE ATTACKS Kyiv appears determined to show U.S. President Donald Trump that it can still fight on, despite the rising death toll and destruction in the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War Two. Ukraine's attack on Russian-occupied territory in the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions followed multiple Russian attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure that have at times left millions of Ukrainians without power during the war. "There is no electricity throughout the region," Yevgeny Balitsky, the Russian-installed governor of Zaporizhzhia, said. "The Ministry of Energy ... has been instructed to develop reserve sources of electricity as soon as possible. Healthcare facilities have been transferred to back up power supply sources." The attack followed drone strikes at the weekend on Russian military airfields, some of which housed long-range nuclear-capable bombers. Ukraine's success in striking deep into Russia has prompted calls by some Russian military bloggers for a harsh response. A Russian artillery strike on the northeast Ukrainian city of Sumy on Tuesday killed three people and wounded 25, local officials said. "That's all one needs to know about the Russian wish to end this war," Zelenskiy said on Telegram. Moscow has responded to such accusations by saying Ukraine is not making a genuine effort to seek peace. At Monday's talks in Istanbul, Russia told Ukraine it would agree to end the war only if Kyiv gives up big new chunks of territory and accepts limits on the size of its army. Ukraine rejects the Russian conditions as tantamount to surrender. "The (peace) settlement theme is extremely complex, it consists of a large number of nuances...," said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, adding that "it would be wrong to expect any immediate solutions and breakthroughs here". (Writing by Timothy HeritageEditing by Gareth Jones)

Zelenskiy aides visit US as Ukraine strikes Russian-held territory

Zelenskiy aides visit US as Ukraine strikes Russian-held territory By Olena Harmash and Aleksandar Vasovic KYIV (Reuters) -Senior Ukrainian...
How the Supreme Court could still reshape religious liberty with decisions in two casesNew Foto - How the Supreme Court could still reshape religious liberty with decisions in two cases

The U.S.Supreme Court's May 22 deadlockprevented the establishment of the nation's first religious charter school. A decision allowing such an institution would have dramatically overhauled long-standing norms about public education and religious freedom in the United States. However, decisions in two other cases centered on religion and the First Amendment are still ahead, and experts say those, too, could reshape what religious liberty means across the nation. The cases – one dealing with public school curriculum and the other with tax exemptions for religious organizations – are "very significant" for different reasons, but all are coming before justices amid a broader trend of the court intervening to protect the free exercise of religion, saidDaniel Conkle, a professor of law emeritus at Indiana University's Maurer School of Law. Plus, there's been an "almost complete ideological switch on the court" in recent years, saidEugene Volokh, a professor of law emeritus at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Law. He and other experts attributed the shift to a conservative majority thatincludes three Trump appointees. The court now tends to have a "very minimalist view of the establishment clause and a very robust view of the free exercise clause," saidErwin Chemerinsky, a law professor and dean of Berkeley Law. In the First Amendment, one clause prohibits the government from establishing a religion and the otherbans the government from interferingwith citizens' free practice of religion as long as, according toa federal court analysis, "the practice does not run afoul of 'public morals' or a 'compelling' governmental interest." The court's rulings in the remaining religious liberty cases will indicate whether that trend will continue. The schoolcase surrounds parents' objectionsin Maryland to books with LGBTQ+ characters that Montgomery County Public Schools, which isbased in the Washington metro area, added toits curriculum in 2022. Though the district initially accommodated parents who did not want their children to be exposed to such materials, itlater prohibited the opt-outs. Parentssued the district,lost their case andultimately appealed to the Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments in April. UCLA's Volokh, whoco-signed an amicus briefwith Yale law professorJustin Driverarguing against a constitutional right to parental opt-outs, said it is "going to be potentially a very important case." ASupreme Courtruling in favor of the parents could open the floodgates to countless other religious objections to public education materials, which Duke law professorRichard Katskeesaid stands to be "incredibly disruptive." "Anybody who's run a school knows you can't provide individualized, tailored instruction to every kid based on that kid's parents' religious viewpoints," Katskee said. There would also be logistical questions to address, including who's responsible for supervising students if they are made to leave their classroom during certain lessons and how to select alternative material that is inoffensive to their parents. Conkle pointed to the Supreme Court's 1972ruling in Wisconsin v. Yoder,which found that a state law requiring Amish parents to send their children to public school until at least the age of 16 violated the parents' free exercise right. Though the Maryland case also revolves around the extent to which religious parents can shape their children's education in a public school setting, Conkle said a decision in favor of the parents could create a "significantly different and greater administrative burden" than the ruling in Yoder did. There would be a greater risk of "administrative headaches" in granting parents the right to opt their children out of any element of public school curriculum they find objectionable, he said, than there is in allowing them to simply opt out of the public school system altogether. "Can public schools really function in that kind of cafeteria-line way?" Chemerinsky said. Justice Elena Kagan questioned the broad scope of opt-outsduring oral arguments. She asked what the implications would be if the court affirmed a constitutional right to effectively "opt out for anything" in public education. LawyerEric Baxter, who is representing the petitioners in the case, was skeptical that such a ruling would lead to countless lawsuits. "We just don't find these kinds of cases or these kinds of burdens where parents are bringing extreme examples," he said. "You know, parents with kids really don't have a lot of time to be suing the school board, and they're looking for a reasonable compromise." Anamicus brief filedbyProtect the First Foundationand other groups argued in support of an opt-out right, saying parents "live in fear that the religious, moral or ethical principles they attempt to instill in their children at home will simply be unwound at school." Abrief from groups includingthe Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission said public schools notifying parents about new reading material and allowing them to opt their children out were "modest accommodations." They argued the district had violated the parents' right to free exercise of their religion, saying that the petitioners have a "religious duty to be their children's primary guardians in matters concerning marriage, sexuality and gender." The tax exemption case centers onwhether a Catholic charity operated by a diocesein Wisconsin is required to contribute to the state's unemployment system. The state's supreme courtpreviously ruled that Catholic Charities, operatedby the Diocese of Superiorin northwest Wisconsin, was not exempt from paying an unemployment tax like the larger Catholic Church is. Religious organizations are not required to pay such taxes, but the state found that the charity's work was too secular in nature to warrant a similar exemption. Justices across the political spectrum "appeared sympathetic" to the notion that that was effectively religious discrimination against Catholic Charities,SCOTUSblog reported. The issue is "conceptually quite important," Volokh said, though its application would depend on states' tax rules and may not have implications as far-reaching as the Maryland case. Most states, however, have laws similar to Wisconsin's that exempt church-controlled organizations "operated primarily for religious purposes" from contributing to unemployment programs,USA TODAY previously reported. The extent to which the charity's work could be considered religious was debated among the justices duringoral arguments in March. Justice Brett Kavanaugh said that the law appears to emphasize "why they do it, not what they do," while Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said what matters is actions, not intentions. "There are lots of hard questions in this area ... but I thought it was pretty fundamental that we don't treat some religions better than other religions," Kagan said. Meanwhile, experts agreed that the court's deadlock in the Oklahoma case leaves room for the question of religious charter schools to return to the court's docket in the future. Chemerinsky said it is "hard to overstate the importance of this issue," which epitomizes the court's shift to a wider application of the free exercise clause. "I think the only conclusion to be drawn is that when the issue comes back to the court, it will all depend on Justice Barrett's views," he said, referencingAmy Coney Barrett's recusalfrom the case. But when it comes to the two other religious cases before the court, experts said their impact will ultimately depend on how the rulings are written. "The broader the rulings, the more destructive they are to public education and to religious freedom for us all," Katskee said. Contributing:Maureen Groppe USA TODAY's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.Funders do not provide editorial input. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Supreme Court's two religious liberty cases could have broad impact

How the Supreme Court could still reshape religious liberty with decisions in two cases

How the Supreme Court could still reshape religious liberty with decisions in two cases The U.S.Supreme Court's May 22 deadlockprevented...
Danny DeVito Admits He 'Lusted After' Michelle Pfeiffer on "Batman Returns" Set

Barry King/WireImage Danny DeVito spoke with Colin Farrell, his fellow portrayer of the DC Comics villain the Penguin, forVariety'sActors on Actorsseries DeVito admitted that during the filming of 1992'sBatman Returns, he "lusted after" costar Michelle Pfeiffer, who played Catwoman "Be still my beating Penguin heart," quipped DeVito Danny DeVitois getting candid about former costarMichelle Pfeiffer. In his conversation withColin FarrellforVariety'sActors on Actorsseries, DeVito, 80, admitted that he "lusted" after Pfeiffer while the two were filming 1992'sTim Burton-directedBatman Returns. "She was a goddess," said DeVito, who played the villainous Penguin opposite Pfeiffer's Catwoman andMichael Keaton's Batman. "If I knew she was going to be in a scene that day …" he trailed off. Farrell, 49, quipped, "Did you brush your teeth that morning?" "I got all flushed," responded theIt's Always Sunny in Philadelphiastar. "Put extra makeup on — 'Give me another pound of makeup.' It was very difficult." Warner Bros. Pictures/Sunset Boulevard/Corbis via Getty Pfeiffer, now 67, was "just so wonderful. And I lusted after her," DeVito added. He then agreed with Farrell that it was his character, Oswald Cobblepot a.k.a. the Penguin, who was doing the lusting. "I kind of feel like she liked it. She liked Oswald," DeVito said. Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. InBatman Returns, Selina Kyle a.k.a. Catwoman rejects Oswald's advances. In 2021, however, DeVito wrote a short story in which the two characters were romantically involved. It was featured in DC Comics'Gotham City Villains, an anthology comic celebrating Batman's rogues gallery. "I got into the fact that I've always been a big fan of Michelle Pfeiffer's, and the Penguin obviously lusts after Catwoman," the Oscar nominee toldEntertainment Weeklyat the time. "So I figured I'd put those two together." Farrell, who played the same role in HBO's dramaThe Penguin, which aired last fall, asked DeVito if he'd play the DC Comics villain again. "Absolutely," answered DeVito. "You can go off the rails with something. The operatic element of Tim Burton'sBatman Returnswas my favorite thing about it — the music and sets and the whole thing. The Shakespeare of it — 'All the world's a stage.' Oswald's realm and his penguins and his minions and his passion. I loved that." Brian J Ritchie/Hotsauce/Shutterstock DeVito later added that his character "would be very content" within his sewer kingdom inBatman Returns— "as long as I could get Catwoman to visit me every once in a while: Be still my beating Penguin heart." After a recent guest star role in acrossover episode withAbbott Elementary, DeVito will continue as a main cast member ofIt's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, airing its 17th season beginning July 9 on FXX. Following his 2024 seriesThe PenguinandSugar, Farrell will next star in Kogonada'sA Big Bold Beautiful Journey(in theaters Sept. 19) and Edward Berger'sThe Ballad of a Small Player. He will also reprise his role as the Penguin in theplanned sequelto Matt Reeves' 2022 hitThe BatmanstarringRobert Pattinson. Read the original article onPeople

Danny DeVito Admits He 'Lusted After' Michelle Pfeiffer on “Batman Returns” Set

Danny DeVito Admits He 'Lusted After' Michelle Pfeiffer on "Batman Returns" Set Barry King/WireImage Danny DeVito spoke wi...

 

ALPHA MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com