Michael J. Fox appeals for help finding lost 'Back to the Future' guitarNew Foto - Michael J. Fox appeals for help finding lost 'Back to the Future' guitar

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Michael J. Fox and other stars of classic film "Back to the Future" appealed for the public's help on Tuesday in locating the red Gibson guitar featured in a memorable scene. Marty McFly, the time-traveling teen portrayed by Fox in the 1985 film, stunned students at a 1950s high school dance with wild electric guitar riffs played on a Gibson ES-345 Cherry Red guitar in the movie. The guitar went missing after production wrapped. "It's somewhere lost in the space-time continuum, or it's in some Teamster's garage," Fox joked in a video released by Gibson. Co-stars Lea Thompson, Christopher Lloyd and Harry Waters Jr. also urged the public to join the search, as did singer Huey Lewis, whose song "The Power of Love" was featured in the movie. Gibson is filming a documentary called "Lost to the Future" about the search for the guitar. It also plans to re-issue the ES-345 Cherry Red in October. People can submit tips about the guitar's whereabout via or via a phone number provided on the site. (Reporting by Lisa Richwine; Editing by Sandra Maler)

Michael J. Fox appeals for help finding lost 'Back to the Future' guitar

Michael J. Fox appeals for help finding lost 'Back to the Future' guitar LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Michael J. Fox and other stars of c...
Clint Eastwood Calls Viral Interview About Not Retiring 'Entirely Phoney'New Foto - Clint Eastwood Calls Viral Interview About Not Retiring 'Entirely Phoney'

Magnus Sundholm/Shutterstock Clint Eastwood is slamming a "phony" interview that was published on his 95th birthday The veteran actor called out Austrian newspaperKurierfor running the story, which was picked up by larger outlets, including PEOPLE "The interview is entirely phony," Eastwood toldDeadline, adding that he hasn't spoken to any writers "in recent weeks" Clint Eastwoodsays a recent viral interview with him never happened. On Monday, June 2, the five-time Academy Award winner called out Austrian newspaperKurierfor publishing a "phony" interview with him last week for his 95th birthday. "A couple of items about me have recently shown up in the news," Eastwood said in a statement toDeadline. Chris Polk/FilmMagic "I thought I would set the record straight. I can confirm I've turned 95. I can also confirm that I never gave an interview to an Austrian publication calledKurier, or any other writer in recent weeks, and that the interview is entirely phony." Though the newspaper has a small audience, the article was picked up by outlets likeDeadline,Reutersand PEOPLE. PEOPLE reached out to Malpaso, Eastwood's production company, and Warner Bros, but did not immediately receive a response. In the circulated article, the veteran actor and producer weighed in on remakes, stating: "I've shot sequels three times, but I haven't been interested in that for a long while. My philosophy is: do something new or stay at home," the Austrian outlet reported per Reuters. Stewart Cook/Variety/Penske Media via Getty He was also quoted as missing "the good old days" when screenwriters had new ideas. "As an actor, I was still under contract with a studio, was in the old system, and thus forced to learn something new every year," the article read. "That's why I'll work as long as I can still learn something, or until I'm truly senile." UnderneathKurier's article on Eastwood, a note says that the paper is "currently investigating the matter." Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Eastwood, whose interview with Kurier would have been a rare one, recently directedJuror #2, which premiered last fall. Read the original article onPeople

Clint Eastwood Calls Viral Interview About Not Retiring ‘Entirely Phoney’

Clint Eastwood Calls Viral Interview About Not Retiring 'Entirely Phoney' Magnus Sundholm/Shutterstock Clint Eastwood is slamming a ...
Putin's uncompromising demands emerge after the latest round of Russia-Ukraine peace talksNew Foto - Putin's uncompromising demands emerge after the latest round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks

Russia took weeks to present Ukraine with a "memorandum" setting out its conditions for a ceasefire, as well as key guidelines for a comprehensive treaty to end the more than3-year-old war. To practically no one's surprise, it's a list of the Kremlin's longstanding, maximalist demands that Kyiv and its Western allies see as nonstarters. Ukraine had set its negotiating stance before Monday'sdirect peace talks in Istanbul, emphasizing its readiness to declare a 30-day ceasefire immediately without preconditions that was proposed by U.S. PresidentDonald Trump. Kyiv reaffirmed its refusal to abandon a bid for NATO membership and rejected acknowledgment of Russia's annexation of any of its regions. Both sides have established mutually exclusive red lines that make any quick deal unlikely. Moscow's demands, published in the Russian media, make it clear thatPresident Vladimir Putin is determinedto ensure the fulfillment of the goals in Ukraine he set when he launched the invasion on Feb. 24, 2022. Key points of the Russian and Ukrainian documents: Moscow's conditions for a 30-day truce Russia offered Ukraine a choice of two options for establishing a 30-day ceasefire. One option is that Ukraine must withdraw its forces from Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson — the four regions Moscow illegally annexed in September 2022 but never fully captured. The second option, described by Moscow as the "package" proposal, presses Ukraine to halt its mobilization efforts and freeze Western arms deliveries — conditions that were suggested earlier by Putin. On top of that, the document also demands that Ukraine begin demobilizing its military, halt any redeployment of forces and ban the presence of any third-country forces on its soil. The "package" option further proposes that Ukraine end martial law and hold elections, after which the two countries could sign a comprehensive peace treaty. Russia's terms for a comprehensive peace treaty The Russian document declares that conditions for peace must include the "international legal recognition" of Moscow's 2014 annexation of Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula and its 2022 annexation of the Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. It says a future peace treaty should have Ukraine declare its neutral status between Russia and the West, and abandon its bid to join NATO. The document demands that Ukraine limit the size of its armed forces, recognize Russian as an official language on par with Ukrainian, ban "glorification and propaganda of Nazism and neo-Nazism" and dissolve nationalist groups -– conditions reflecting Putin's goals from the outset of his invasion. The false allegations that neo-Nazi groups were shaping Ukraine's politics under President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who is Jewish, have been vehemently dismissed by Kyiv and its Western allies. In Russia's view, a comprehensive peace treaty should also see both countries lift all sanctions and restrictions, abandon any claims to compensation for wartime damage, resume trade and communications, and reestablish diplomatic ties. It also suggests that the peace treaty between Russian and Ukraine be endorsed by a resolution of the U.N. Security Council. Ukraine's ceasefire position also remains firm The memorandum that Ukraine submitted to Moscow before the talks and shared with its allies emphasized the need for a full and unconditional 30-day ceasefire to set stage for peace negotiations. It reaffirmed Ukraine's consistent rejection of Russian demands for neutral status as an attack on its sovereignty, declaring it is free to choose its alliances and adding that its NATO membership will depend on consensus with the alliance. It emphasized Kyiv's rejection of any restrictions on the size and other parameters of its armed forces, as well as curbs on the presence of foreign troops on its soil. Ukraine's memorandum also opposed recognizing any Russian territorial gains, while describing the current line of contact as a starting point in negotiations. The document noted the need for international security guarantees to ensure the implementation of peace agreements and prevent further aggression. The Ukrainian peace proposal also demanded the return of all deported and illegally displaced Ukrainian children and an "all-for-all" prisoner exchange. It held the door open to gradual lifting of some of the sanctions against Russia if it abides by the agreement. The opposing positions make peace seem elusive The sharply conflicting demandsleave little hopefor any quick progress in talks. By maintaining its maximalist demands, Moscow is seemingly unfazed by repeated threats of sanctions by the West or other pressure to make real concessions. Some observers see the Russian memorandum as a way by Moscow to formalize its negotiation position. "Even an unsigned document gives the Kremlin a firmer diplomatic foothold," said Moscow-based defense analyst Sergei Poletaev. Tatiana Stanovaya of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center noted that the document reflects Putin's key goal of securing a "friendly" Ukraine without a full-fledged military or ties of any kind with its Western allies. She noted the Russian document offers Ukraine a choice between the two options because Moscow knows that a Ukrainian withdrawal from the four regions "is not viable and seeks to push Kyiv toward the second as the primary course." At the same time, Moscow's memorandum appears to indicate that "Russia is open to considering leaving parts of the annexed regions that it does not control to Ukraine." Stanovaya said Moscow's maximalist demands mean that "the fighting is set to continue, even if bilateral interactions persist."

Putin's uncompromising demands emerge after the latest round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks

Putin's uncompromising demands emerge after the latest round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks Russia took weeks to present Ukraine with a ...
Pamela Hemphill, who rejected her Jan. 6 pardon, says 'it was not OK that day'New Foto - Pamela Hemphill, who rejected her Jan. 6 pardon, says 'it was not OK that day'

Pamela Hemphill, aformer supporterofPresident Donald Trumpwho served two months in prison for storming the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, has formally rejected thepresident's pardon. Hemphill told USA TODAY that she filed documents to turn down the pardon earlier this year with the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of the Pardon Attorney through the office of Sen. James Risch of Idaho. "I don't want to be a part of their narrative," she told USA TODAY about why she didn't accept the pardon. "And then, of course, it's a slap in the face to the Capitol police officers and to our rule of law." On Jan. 6, 2021, Hemphill was among the thousands of Trump supporterswho stormed the Capitol buildingin Washington, D.C., to protest the 2020 presidential election results. She pled guilty to one misdemeanor count of parading, demonstrating or picketing in the Capitol building and was sentenced to two months in jail, 36 months of probation and $500 restitution. On Jan. 20, Trump pardoned more than 1,500 people charged in the Capitol attack. In an April 2 letter to Sen. Risch that Hemphill shared with USA TODAY, the Pardon Attorney's office said it noted her "non-acceptance" of the pardon. "Our Office will not issue Ms. Hemphill a certificate of pardon and will refrain from requesting any notation of pardon on her criminal history record," the letter says. A spokesperson for Sen. Risch said the senator's office regularly assists constituents with matters pertaining to federal agencies and declined to reveal additional details about Hemphill's case. The Office of the Pardon Attorney and the White House did not immediately respond to request for comment. The 72-year-old said she pursued formally turning down the pardon because she wanted to be honest. "How could I live my life knowing that I was guilty and then I took that pardon?" she said. "It's kind of like a message that it was OK that day − it was not OK that day. That was the worst day of my life." She said choosing to speak out against Trump's Jan. 6 pardons has been difficult at times, citing backlash she's received from some Trump supporters. But "it's been worth it to know that maybe there's another Pam out there that might listen to me and and get away from the MAGA call," she said. "The benefits of being honest with yourself outweigh any of the smear campaigns you might get or the backlash, because you sleep good at night," she said. "It's inner peace." Hemphill said she started to reconsider her support of Trump about six months after she was released from prison in 2022. "It's been a gradual process, it's not like I had a white light experience," she said. Since then, Hemphill has spoken out against Trump and his narrative surrounding the Capitol attack. She alsovoted for Kamala Harrisin the 2024 presidential election. According to theConstitution, a pardon can be rejected by the person it is tendered to. After Trump issued pardons for the Jan. 6 defendants, Hemphill said she initially wrote a letter to the Office of the Pardon Attorney asking to not be included in the act. Sen. Risch's office helped her file the correct paperwork, she said, and about a month later they received the formal letter acknowledging her "non-acceptance" of the pardon. Jason Riddle, a New Hampshire man who served 90 days in jail for participation in the attack, said in January that he also rejected the pardon, according toNew Hampshire Public Radio. It's unclear whether any other individuals charged in the riot have turned down Trump's pardon. Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached atmelina.khan@usatoday.com. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Capitol rioter Pamela Hemphill rejects Trump's Jan. 6 pardon

Pamela Hemphill, who rejected her Jan. 6 pardon, says 'it was not OK that day'

Pamela Hemphill, who rejected her Jan. 6 pardon, says 'it was not OK that day' Pamela Hemphill, aformer supporterofPresident Donald ...
Salma Hayek, Linda Evangelista mark family milestone: 'We are so proud'New Foto - Salma Hayek, Linda Evangelista mark family milestone: 'We are so proud'

Salma Hayek and Linda Evangelista are celebrating a milestone in their blended family. Evangelista's son with François-Henri Pinault, who is married to Hayek, graduated from high school over the weekend, and all three were on hand for the occasion. On June 2, Evangelista shared aseries of photosfrom the event to Instagram, including one with the three co-parents alongside the graduate, Augustin Evangelista Pinault. "I'm one proud momma," the former model wrote. The next day, Hayektook to Instagramto make her own post congratulating "Augie." "We are so PROUD of you congratulations for becoming the extraordinary young man that you are and managing to still be our lovely boy," Hayek wrote. The actress added, "congratulations to Linda, Francois and all the parents who got our babies up to this point. Easier said than done." Hayek has been married to Pinault since 2009. Evangelista gave birth to her and Pinault's son together in 2006, though the father's identity was not known until she filed a child support lawsuit five years later. The lawsuit led to a highly publicized child support trial that was settled in court in 2012, according toReuters. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Salma Hayek Pinault (@salmahayek) Pinault and Hayek share a daughter, who was born in 2007. In addition to sharing congratulations, commenters on the two posts praised the celebrities for navigating a blended family. "How beautiful to see you ladies come together to raise a great young man," one person wrote on Hayek's post. On Evangelista's post, another said, "What a beautiful example of a blended family." Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached atmelina.khan@usatoday.com. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Salma Hayek celebrates stepson's graduation with Linda Evangelista

Salma Hayek, Linda Evangelista mark family milestone: 'We are so proud'

Salma Hayek, Linda Evangelista mark family milestone: 'We are so proud' Salma Hayek and Linda Evangelista are celebrating a mileston...

 

ALPHA MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com