Metal heads, TikTokers, shiny new airports: Greenland, but not as you think you know itNew Foto - Metal heads, TikTokers, shiny new airports: Greenland, but not as you think you know it

NUUK, Greenland − Musicians Pani and Sebastian Enequist sport once-suppressed Inuit face tattoos, hunt seals for food in remote fjords and honor nature "like a God." But they found their calling − and each other − while they were obsessing over the American heavy metal band Slipknot. For thousands of years, Greenland's Inuit people survived the world's harshest conditions by living off whales, seals, polar bears, fish and caribou. Now,gleaming new airportsare opening up. TikTok stars are proliferating. A relatively isolated indigenous culture, long dominated by ruling Denmark, finds itself increasingly exposed to the world just asPresident Donald Trumppushes to take over the Arctic territory. Still, if music can tell ancient and modern stories alike, then theSound of the Damned, the Enequists' Nuuk-based hardcore metal band, has a musical plotline that wends across time and place. The group's raspy, guttural-growl vocals, introspective lyrics and aggressive beats are old and young. Native and foreign-born. They illustrate how change is sweeping through the island's unique heritage, even as some things stay the same. 'Buy us!':Greenlanders shocked, intrigued, bewildered by Trump zeal for Arctic territory "We want to play metal. We also want to represent our culture," said Pani Enequist, 32, who writes Sound of the Damned's lyrics and recently began performing with them. Her husband Sebastian, 29, is the band's lead singer and guitarist. The group's new material incorporates an Inuit drum called a "qilaat," mask dancing and throat singing, where hums, gasps and grunts mimic the sounds of animals, streams and icebergs. The Enequists said that in 2016, they were among the first of a new generation of Greenlanders to get face tattoos, known in GreenlandicKakiuineq, as a way to reclaim and celebrate their Inuit ancestral roots, traditions and spirituality. They also view them as a way of rejecting the legacy of Denmark's 18th-centuryChristian missionaries, who labeled the practice as paganand sought to have it banned. Their meanings are linked to Inuit cosmology and rites of passage. Trump wants to buy Greenland:Denmark's first move? Alter its royal coat of arms Greenland's music scene is small, with the number of musicians and bands working in Nuuk estimated in the low dozens, according to Christian Elsner, whose family owns Atlantic Music, a record label and music store in Greenland's capital that sells instruments and albums. Greenland has a Spotify-style streaming service calledTusass Music, linked to its postal service, only accessible to users in Greenland and Denmark. Atlantic Music also houses one of Greenland's few full-blown recording studios. It sits in the basement of a squat, gabled house framed by a veranda-style front porch. Across the street is Nuuk Center, an eight-story ultra-modern office tower, which would not look out of place in a European city. Greenland's not for sale:It is welcoming Americans with direct flights. On Trump's birthday Nuuk Center is Greenland's tallest building. It is also home to its first shopping mall, which opened in 2012. On its upper floors are offices for theNaalakkersuisutor Greenlandic government, which is trying to boost tourism and the local economy by rebuilding andexpanding three new airportsfor direct international flights. The first directU.S. flights to Greenlandbegan on June 14 − Trump's birthday. This is something many Greenlanders feel ambivalent about. They want American tourists to visit. They don't want to become part of the United States,polls show. Laura Lennert Jensen works for Arctic Sounds, a Greenland-based music management company that represents and promotes local artists. Arctic Sounds also stages an annual music festival − theArctic Sounds Festival− in Sisimiut, in central western Greenland, which showcases original music acts from Nordic countries. About 90% of Greenland's 57,000 people identify as Inuit. Jensen said Greenlanders first started making popular music that wasn't traditional Inuit music in the 1970s. In keeping with the times, it was influenced by popular British rock and roll acts of the day, such as Pink Floyd and Deep Purple. Over time, access to the internet improved. So did the advent of software that made it easier for musicians to write and record music without a professional studio. Greenland's music has diversified to include rap, reggae, electronica, country, pop and everything in between. 'One way or the other':Five ways Trump's Greenland saga could play out On a recent evening in Nuuk, Jensen took USA TODAY on a whistle-stop tour of a few of Nuuk's live music hotspots, where the acts included lounge singers, folk rock bands and jazz artists. All sang in Greenlandic to attentive local audiences. As didKuuna, an up-and-coming pop singer who strode self-assuredly around the ring, belting out tunes in between rounds at a Thai boxing event like a fledgling Greenlandic version ofBeyoncé. "Some of our musicians do not carry a single trace of Inuit music in what they create," Jensen said. "Others carry it as symbolism, to reflect history or to revitalize techniques that have been lost." Greenland was a Danish colonyuntil 1953. For hundreds of years prior, it was under Danish authority. That era began with the arrival of a Danish-Norwegian Lutheran missionary priest named Hans Egede in 1721. In 1979, Greenland was granted home rule. Thirty years later, it became a self-governing entity. Today, Denmark retains control overGreenland's foreign affairs, defense and macro-economic policy. The Greenlandic government manages areas such as education, healthcare, natural resources and culture. During colonial rule, Denmark enforced assimilation policies for the Inuit population. It unofficially prohibited the Greenlandic language. In 1951, it removed 22 children from their families and put them in Danish homes, an experiment aimed at turning them into model "Little Danes." 'We want to be Greenlanders':Slow independence party wins vote, but pro-US party gains In the 1960s and 1970s, as many as 4,500 women and girls − half of the fertile women in Greenland, according toDanish authorities− were subjected to forced sterilization by government physicians, using painful intrauterine devices. Greenland was in the early stages of its modernization. This included a construction boom that attracted many Danish workers and led to a high birth rate among Inuit women. Denmark's city planners wanted to limit Greenland's population growth. TheDanish governmenthas issued formal apologies for these policies. But many Greenlanders remain shocked and bitter about these episodes, which helped fuel calls for independence from Denmark. Greenlanders also believe that deep-rooted biases remain and a broader pattern of ongoing systemic discrimination favors Danes in areas such as access to lucrative jobs and promotions, according to Ulrik Pram Gad, a researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies in Copenhagen. "Many of us feel like there is discrimination in the workplace in Greenland when it comes to high-ranking positions," said Orla Joelsen, a prison official in Nuuk whose job falls under the authority of Denmark's justice department. Joelsen said he was speaking in a private capacity. Greenlanders are underrepresented in the upper echelons of the island's corporate world, according to Gad, the Denmark-based researcher. In his spare time, Joelsen runs apopular X account about Greenlandthat has been highly critical of Trump's interest in Greenland. "It's going to be a long four years," he said. Some Greenlanders appear more ready than others for Greenland's shifting cultural tectonic plates. "On my TikTok account, I talk a lot about what groceries I'm buying," said Malu Falck, 32, a singer and graphic designer in Nuuk whose short-form social videos about everyday life in Greenland have helped bring her a whole new following. Falck has almost10,000 followers on TikTok. She is not yet making money off of TikTok, she said, though her image was displayed as part of an ad in the window of a Nuuk storefront. "It's new in Greenland, but people are getting used to it," Falck said of TikTok. She estimated that about 100 Greenlanders are "very active" on YouTube, TikTok and other social media. One of them isQupanuk Olsen, a Greenlandic mining engineer and politician known for her vlogs about Greenland's culture, history and traditional Inuit life. Olsen's posts on Instagram, TikTok and YouTube routinely reach half a million people. But it is in music where Greenland's overlapping identities are perhaps most directly observable. Varna Marianne Nielsen, 44, is a Greenlandic filmmaker, music producer and practitioner of traditional drum dancing and drum singing. The latter involves performing with a stick made of bone or wood that is rhythmically struck against a frame drum orqilaatto make an echoing beat. Distorted maps have misled you:Greenland isn't as big as you think. Nielsen descends from a long line of drum dancers, but grew up listening to American blues, jazz and rock music. "I have both of these traditions in me," she said. Nielsen described her music as "sweeping from the ice and the land." In 2014, she had a role in an episode of the TV series "True Detective," for which she co-produced multiple original scores. Nielsen said that, as a child, she was proud of her Greenlandic heritage but didn't necessarily understand how her identity had been shaped and influenced by Denmark. As an adult, Nielsen said, she has felt compelled to help revive thedrum dancing and drum singingtradition that was neglected by earlier generations. Her work includes field recordings and electronically-composed beats. Nielsen was surprised to learn recently, while doing research in Denmark, that her grandfather's drum was exhibited in the National Museum in Copenhagen. She found this discovery upsetting because it illustrated how, even now, Greenland's culture is being expropriated by Denmark. "It is still difficult to access our treasures when they are in a different country and not home where they belong," she said, adding that she hoped Danish authorities would repatriate Greenland's drums. Like Pani Enequist from Sound of the Damned, Nielsen's fingers are encircled by tattoos. Their meaning connects toSassuma Arnaa, or "Mother of the Sea," an Inuit creation myth about the goddess Sedna. Versions of the myth vary. But the story tells how Sedna came to rule over the Inuit underworld. In one version, Sassuma was a woman who was mistreated by her family and thrown into the sea by her father, when her fingers were severed and became seals, whales and other marine life for which the Arctic is known. Sound of the Damned is spending several weeks this summer touring Danish schools, where band members will talk to children about Greenland's Inuit culture. On stage, they wear "corpse paint"– a style of makeup that gives them a macabre look. Enequist said this has little to do withGreenlandand everything to do with music from Metallica to Slipknot that shaped the band's sound and formed the backdrop to her courtship with her husband. "There is no contradiction in that," she said. Elsner, whose family owns Atlantic Music, is also a musician. He plays inNanook, perhaps Greenland's most successful band of the modern era. The group's name refers to Greenland's mythological polar bear, which is on the territory's coat of arms and symbolizes Greenland's wildness. Since the band formed in 2008, Nanook's brand of melancholic folk-pop has sold around 5,000 records in Greenland − meaning that about 1 in 10 Greenlanders, 1 in 4 or 5 households, could own one. Nanook refused an offer to sign with the Sony record label early on in the band's career because it wanted them to sing in English. Elsner said he and his brother, also a vocalist in Nanook, found the idea "too awkward and unnatural." They also worried it would be a kind of betrayal of their Greenlandic inheritance. Not many international music artists travel to Greenland, Elsner said. Distance and expense are factors. Also, there are no roads connecting Greenland's settlements. Nanook has toured Greenland by boat, plane, helicopter, dog sled and snowmobile. Never a tour bus. Elsner said that even though the American metal band Metallica has a Danish drummer in Lars Ulrich, the California-based group has never made the trip. But in the late 1990s, a British band called Blur did show up in Greenland. They played to about 1,000 people in a now-defunct Nuuk bowling alley. AndDamon Albarn, Blur's lead singer, endeared himself to Greenlanders, Elsner said, because he did an interview that featured in a documentary saying it was hypocritical for Westerners to criticize Greenlanders for eating seals, whales and other Arctic marine life when there wasn't any major livestock industry in Greenland. "Seals," Albarn said, were "the cows of Greenland" and they had much better lives – and deaths − than Western industrial livestock, which are often raised in intenseconfinement in pens and cages. Elsner said Greenland is a paradox. "It's this crazy beautiful place where there is a dark side," he said, referring to high rates ofalcoholism, suicide and incestin some communities. He said Greenland's good and bad, old and new, seeps into its music. Socially conscious rapperstalk about colonization. Metal bands like Sound the Damned sing about "how they want their culture back." Other musicians address the idea of independence from Denmark. And others still, like Elsner's own band, write songs about nature and "stuff that happens to us" and deliberately avoid writing political songs. And if they do, couch them in metaphors "so it doesn't affect some people the wrong way," he said. Greenland's music, Elsner said, is, like the place, staying true to its origins yet also evolving. There are signs, beyond music, of Greenland on the move. A reporter saw one Tesla hum and whir by in Nuuk. There's rumored to be a second one among Greenland's approximately 6,500 cars for an island that's about half the size of the Indian subcontinent and has fewer than 60 miles of road and just three traffic lights. A local boat captain who sails with tourists in Nuuk and elsewhere said that he'd seen only one polar bear in his entire life. It was in a zoo in Copenhagen. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Metal heads, TikTokers and more: Greenland − but not as you know it

Metal heads, TikTokers, shiny new airports: Greenland, but not as you think you know it

Metal heads, TikTokers, shiny new airports: Greenland, but not as you think you know it NUUK, Greenland − Musicians Pani and Sebastian Enequ...
Budget bill includes $10B payday for states that spent on border securityNew Foto - Budget bill includes $10B payday for states that spent on border security

Tucked into the budget reconciliation bill is a Texas-sized golden nugget: $13.5 billion that could pay back what thestate spent on border securityduring the Biden administration. The bill – which passed Congress on July 3 – doesn't mention Texas by name. ButTexas Gov. Greg Abbott lobbied hardfor the line item's inclusion, and the state's Republican Sens.Ted Cruzand John Cornyn fought for the reimbursement. "Under Operation Lone Star, Texas allocated more than $11 billion of Texas taxpayer money for border security, and earlier this year I requested Congress reimburse Texas for these costs in full," Abbott said in a May statement, after an initial version of the bill passed in the House of Representatives. The new "State Border Border Security Reinforcement Fund" earmarks $10 billion for grants to states that paid for border barriers or other security measures beginning Jan. 20, 2021 – PresidentJoe Biden's inauguration day. Notably, during the Biden administration, no other state spent more than Texas on border security measures. Under Operation Lone Star, the state deployed thousands of Texas National Guard troops to the border, placed controversial buoy barriers in the Rio Grande and paid tobus more than 100,000 migrantsto Democrat-led cities around the country. Abbott was one of Biden's leading critics on the border during a period when the Border Patrol was registering more than 2 million migrant encounters a year – many of them lawful asylum-seekers. The "reinforcement" provision "just says 'states can apply.' But what states incurred expenses? Texas and Arizona," said Adam Isacson, director of defense oversight for the Washington Office on Latin America. Early during the Biden administration, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican, sought to build a makeshift border barrier out of old shipping containers. But legal challenges forced his administration to remove the barrier, and his Democratic successor, Gov. Katie Hobbs, had previously asked the Biden administrationto reimburse the state for border securityfunding totaling $513 million. The budget reconciliation bill includes an additional $3.5 billion under a fund whose acronym spells BIDEN: "Bridging Immigration-related Deficits Experienced Nationwide." That money can be disbursed to states that aid the federal government in its immigration crackdown. In an emailed response to questions, Abbott Press Secretary Andrew Mahaleris declined to say how much money Texas will apply for but told USA TODAY the governor "will continue to work closely with the Trump administration to secure the border. " This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Budget bill includes $10B for states that spent on border security

Budget bill includes $10B payday for states that spent on border security

Budget bill includes $10B payday for states that spent on border security Tucked into the budget reconciliation bill is a Texas-sized golden...
The Most Controversial Moments From This Beloved '90s Sitcom — Would They Air Today?New Foto - The Most Controversial Moments From This Beloved '90s Sitcom — Would They Air Today?

The Most Controversial Moments From This Beloved '90s Sitcom — Would They Air Today?originally appeared onParade. It's been 36 years sinceSeinfeldfirst aired — and sitcoms haven't been the same since, and for good reason. The hit comedy, starringJerry Seinfeld,Julia Louis-Dreyfus,Jason AlexanderandMichael Richards, follows a group of friends navigating life in New York City, encountering the kinds of quirky characters and absurd situations that could only happen inSeinfeld— and in The Big Apple. The classic series gave us countless unforgettable moments, from the Soup Nazi to Elaine's questionable dance moves, it truly left a permanent mark on pop culture. But as fans have pointed out, some of the show's humor hasn't aged quite as well. Like many '90s sitcoms,Seinfeldpushed the envelope — and sometimes, crossed lines that wouldn't fly today. To its credit,Seinfeldhas held up better than many shows of its time. Iconic episodes like "The Puffy Shirt," where Jerry reluctantly models a ridiculous blouse and shouts, "But I don't wanna be a pirate!" remains as a fan favorite. Still, certain episodes fall flat, or worse, when viewed through a modern lens. From cultural appropriation to tone-deaf jokes, some plots are just plain problematic. Two episodes were even scrapped entirely due to controversial content. Yet other episodes made it to air and continue to spark debate amongst fans. One of the most controversial episodes is Season 5's "The Cigar Store Indian" — and the title alone tells you why. In it, Jerry tries to smooth things over with Elaine by giving her a Native American statue. When he presents it, he begins making stereotypical and offensive remarks — unaware that one of Elaine's friends that's standing there is Native. According toScreen Rant, writersTom GammillandMax Prossoriginally planned for Jerry to give her a moose head, which would've upset her animal rights activist friend. But Seinfeld reportedly felt that was too old school — and pushed for something more politically incorrect. The result? One of the show's most cringe-worthy and offensive episodes. Another poorly aged plot appears in Season 4's "The Outing." In it, Elaine tries to "convert" a gay man after falling for him — missing the mark entirely on how sexual orientation works. The episode tries to play off the humor with the now-infamous line, "Not that there's anything wrong with that," but the concept still feels off. Then there's Season 6's "The Chinese Woman." Jerry starts dating a woman he assumes is Chinese based on her name, only to be surprised when she's not. When Elaine confronts him, he defends himself by saying, "If I like their race, how can that be racist?" Not exactly the best argument. ThoughSeinfelddidn't get everything right, fans of the beloved series still binge watch it today — and continue debating whether the finale was a satisfying ending to their favorite sitcom. The Most Controversial Moments From This Beloved '90s Sitcom — Would They Air Today?first appeared on Parade on Jul 5, 2025 This story was originally reported byParadeon Jul 5, 2025, where it first appeared.

The Most Controversial Moments From This Beloved '90s Sitcom — Would They Air Today?

The Most Controversial Moments From This Beloved '90s Sitcom — Would They Air Today? The Most Controversial Moments From This Beloved ...
Mel Gibson Slammed for 'Expensive' London Film and Comic Con PricesNew Foto - Mel Gibson Slammed for 'Expensive' London Film and Comic Con Prices

Mel Gibson Slammed for 'Expensive' London Film and Comic Con Pricesoriginally appeared onParade. Mel Gibsonis making his London Film & Comic Con debut, but his V.I.P. photo and autograph package prices are the main reason fans are talking about his appearance. A standard autograph from theBraveheartactor, 69, will cost fans £195, which is equivalent to $266.28. A standard photoshoot with Mel is £175 ($238.97), while aMad Maxprop photoshoot costs £200 ($273.11). For fans who want the exclusive Diamond Pass, which includes one autograph, one standard photoshoot and one gift, they will have to pay £425 ($580.36). The convention's guests can also choose to purchase a photo with Mel and hisLethal WeaponcostarDanny Gloverfor £270 ($368.70). London Film & Comic Con will commence on Saturday, June 5, and will conclude two days later. Showmasters announced they had booked Mel for the convention on May 22 viaX, leading fans to comment on Mel's pricey autograph and photo prices. "We're thrilled to announce Hollywood legend MEL GIBSON is joining us for London Film & Comic Con, marking his first and only planned European comic con appearance!" the statement read. "Mel is a legendary actor, director and producer, best known as Martin Riggs inLethal Weapon, William Wallace inBraveheartand Max in the originalMad Maxtrilogy!" The post continued, "He's also appeared inConspiracy Theory, theJohn Wickprequel showThe Continental,What Women Want,We Were Soldiersand provided voices for Rocky inChicken Runand John Smith in Disney'sPocahontas, to name just a few of his credits!" Fans replied to the announcement, leading one fan to write, "As much as I would love to meet Mel Gibson, Showmasters is having a laugh if they think [I] am paying that." A second person reacted to the comment and was upset about the markup of the add-on package from the event. "It shows the lack of awareness of Hollywood people," the fan wrote. "He's a millionaire and thinks his fans are if they'd pay that much for a photo or an autograph." Meanwhile, a third person replied, "I would've paid to get a photo with him, but not at that price, Mel might be a millionaire, but I'm not." Nonetheless, other attendees raved about purchasing their add-ons and shared their excitement toward the event. "Going on that day. I hope to do Mel twice for Braveheart or Lethal Weapon posters but I may have to stick with one cause Mel is expensive," a separate fan explained. 🎬SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox🎬 Mel Gibson Slammed for 'Expensive' London Film and Comic Con Pricesfirst appeared on Parade on Jul 5, 2025 This story was originally reported byParadeon Jul 5, 2025, where it first appeared.

Mel Gibson Slammed for ‘Expensive’ London Film and Comic Con Prices

Mel Gibson Slammed for 'Expensive' London Film and Comic Con Prices Mel Gibson Slammed for 'Expensive' London Film and Comic...
How Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is standing out from her liberal colleaguesNew Foto - How Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is standing out from her liberal colleagues

WASHINGTON − After Supreme CourtJustice Amy Coney Barrettannounced from the court's mahogany bench last month that lower court judges hadgone too farin pausingPresident Donald Trump's changes to birthright citizenship, the court's liberals got their turn. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the most senior of the three justices appointed by Democratic presidents, read parts of the trio's joint dissent for about twice as long as Barrett had described the conservative majority's opinion. She even added a line that doesn't appear in thewritten version. "The other shoe has dropped on presidential immunity," Sotomayorsaid, referencing the court's landmark2024 decisionlimiting when presidents can be prosecuted for actions they take in office. But it was a separate written dissent fromJustice Ketanji Brown Jacksonthat reverberated the most, in large part because of Barrett's scathing reaction to it. "We will not dwell on Justice Jackson's argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries' worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself," Barrett wrote. More:Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson can throw a punch. Literally. It wasn't the first time in recent months that Jackson's words drew attention. In a case about air pollution rules, Jacksonsaidthe case "gives fodder to the unfortunate perception that moneyed interests enjoy an easier road to relief in this Court than ordinary citizens." When her conservative colleagues gaveElon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency complete access to the data of millions of Americans kept by the U.S. Social Security Administration, Jackson said the court wassending a "troubling message"that it's departing from basic legal standards for the Trump administration. Speaking at a judge's conference in May, Jacksoncondemnedthe attacks Trump and his allies were making on judges who ruled against his policies. Her warning that the "threats and harassment" could undermine the Constitution and the rule of law was stronger than concerns expressed by Sotomayor and by Chief Justice John Roberts. And during the eight months that the justices heard cases, Jackson – the court's newest member in an institution that reveres seniority – once again spoke by far the most. "I definitely do think Justice Jackson really prioritizes developing her own jurisprudence and thoughts and voice," said Brian Burgess, a partner at the law firm Goodwin who clerked for Sotomayor. "I can see Justice Jackson evolving into someone that wants to speak directly to the public to express the concerns of that side of the court." A clock, a mural, a petition:Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's chambers tell her story Nominatedby PresidentJoe Bidenin 2022 to succeed Justice Stephen Breyer, Jackson wasted no time being heard. During her first two weeks on the court, shespoke more than twice as many wordsas any of her colleagues. When asked about her volubility, Jackson has said she became used to operating solo on the bench during her eight years as a federal trial court judge. She hasn't shown many signs of adjusting. Since October, Jackson spoke 50% more words on the bench than Sotomayor who was the next talkative, according to statistics compiled by Adam Feldman and Jake S. Truscott for theEmpirical SCOTUS blog. "She's the only one that has ever done what she's doing in terms of total volume of speech in her first few terms," said Feldman, a lawyer and political scientist. Jackson has been working on her communications skills since elementary school when her mother enrolled her in a public speaking program. "She wanted me to get out there and use my voice," Jacksonsaidduring an appearance at the Kennedy Center last year to talk about her memoir. And it's not just her voice. Jackson wrote more – either opinions, concurrences or dissents – this term than anyone except Justice Clarence Thomas, according to EmpiricalSCOTUSblog. Steve Vladeck, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, said he is going to add her dissent in the air pollution case to his course on federal courts. "She is calling things as she sees them," Vladeck said on the liberalStrict Scrutinypodcast. Jackson went further in that case, and in some others, than her liberal colleagues. Sotomayor wrote her own dissent of the majority's ruling that fuel producers can challenge California emissions standards under a federal air pollution law. And Kagan was in the 7-2 majority. In fact, Kagan was in the majority more often this term than all but Roberts, Barrett and Justice Brett Kavanaugh – the three conservatives who often control the direction of the court. Jackson was in the majority the least often. "You see Justice Kagan really shifting away from Justices Sotomayor and Jackson," legal analyst Sarah Isgur said on the podcastAdvisory Opinionwhere she dissects the court with fellow conservatives. Burgess, the former Sotomayor clerk, disputed that. He said the times Kagan voted against both Sotomayor and Jackson were not high-profile defections. For example, in the air pollution case, Burgess suspects Kagan agreed with Jackson that the court should not have heard the fuel producers' appeal in part because their underlying complaint was likely to be addressed by the Trump administration. But once they took the case, the justices decided the legal issue in a way that didn't break a lot of new ground, he said. "I think she seems to be more interested in coalition building and finding ways to eke out wins," Burgess said of Kagan's overall style. "That's one way to be influential. Another way to be influential is to try to stake out different views and hope that history comes along to your position over time." In one of Jackson'sstrong dissents, in acaseabout whether the Americans with Disabilities Act protected a disabled retiree whose health benefits were reduced, Sotomayor was on board – except for a footnote. In that lengthy paragraph, Jackson criticized her conservative colleagues' use of "pure textualism" as "certainly somehow always flexible enough to secure the majority's desired outcome." "She's saying what I think so many of us have been thinking," Vladeck said on the podcast. He wondered whether Sotomayor didn't sign onto that footnote because she didn't agree with it or because she wanted to "let Jackson have it for herself and not take credit for what really is an unusually strong accusation of methodological manipulation by one of the justices." Strong accusations flew in both directions about the court's ruling limiting the ability of judges to pause Trump's policies. In her solo dissent, Jackson called the majority's "legalese" a smokescreen obscuring a "basic question of enormous legal and practical significance: May a federal court in the United States of America order the Executive to follow the law?" "The very institution our founding charter charges with the duty to ensure universal adherence to the law now requires judges to shrug and turn their backs to intermittent lawlessness," she wrote. "With deep disillusionment, I dissent." Barrett said there's no dispute that presidents must obey the law. "But the Judiciary does not have unbridled authority to enforce this obligation – in fact, sometimes the law prohibits the Judiciary from doing so," she wrote. Jackson, Barrett said, would "do well to heed her own admonition" that everyone from the president on down is bound by the law. "That goes for judges too," she wrote. Legal commentator David Lat said Barrett's response departed from her usual "rather restrained rhetoric." In aSubstack article, Lat noted that Barrett oncedescribedherself as a "one jalapeño gal" compared to the late Justice Antonin Scalia, for whom Barrett clerked, who had a "five jalapeño" style. Feldman said it's possible that Jackson's willingness to vocalize her disagreements with her conservative colleagues is getting under their skins. In aFebruary articleabout how Barrett and Jackson are shaping the future of constitutional law, Feldman said the two sharp legal minds approach cases from strikingly different angles on how the law should function and who it should protect. Barrett prioritizes legal precision and institutional boundaries while Jackson focuses on real-world impact and individual rights, he wrote. When people look back at the Trump case, he told USA TODAY, they will be talking about Jackson's dissent. "That's probably the one from the term," he said, "that will last the longest." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:How Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is speaking up and standing out

How Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is standing out from her liberal colleagues

How Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is standing out from her liberal colleagues WASHINGTON − After Supreme CourtJustice Amy Coney Barrettannou...

 

ALPHA MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com