"Golden Bachelor" Mel Owens Speaks Out After His Controversial Comments About Not Dating Women Over 60

Taylor Hill/FilmMagic New Golden Bachelor Mel Owens speaks out about his controversial comments about not dating women over 60 Owens previously shared that he hopes to find a partner who is between the ages of 45 and 60 and likes to "work out, stay fit, eat, have fun, be energetic and live life" The comments sparked an outcry from Bachelor Nation fans, including Chrishell Stause New Golden Bachelor Mel Owens is addressing his controversial comments about the age range of women who will compete for his heart. Two months after the retired NFL player-turned-lawyer, 66, said on theMGoBlue Podcastthat his "preferences" for dating were between the ages of 45 and 60 (which caused a stir among Bachelor Nation fans), Owens is apologizing. He toldGlamourthat he realized his comments — he also said he'd told an executive producer of the show, "If they're 60 or over, I'm cutting them" — were inappropriate after a 65-year-old longtime friend called him out. "She said, 'What you said was insensitive, and it's just not who you are.' My reference of dating was 39, 40 years old. I hadn't dated in 26, 27 years. That's what I told her," he said. "She goes, 'It doesn't matter. You've said some things that are just incredibly wrong.' And I go, 'I've got to apologize.'" "I didn't know anything about theGolden Bachelorages," he admitted. Disney/Maarten de Boer "I didn't know the age range because I wasn't watching it. I'm thinking, to me, the age range was 45 to 60. That's my age range. I'm thinking that's the gold years for me. My reference, again, was when I was dating at 39, 40. I hadn't dated in 26 years, so I had no clue. And that's why I said that comment." Owens also said he "didn't know that [Gerry Turner] gotmarriedand thendivorced" on the show's first season. "I didn't know any of it." "I apologized to the women on the show. When I first walked in, I addressed it. I apologized to them. I said, 'It was unfair, insensitive. I want to earn it back. Just give me the chance,'" he told the outlet. https://people-app.onelink.me/HNIa/kz7l4cuf He also revealed that several of the contestants on his season have spoken to him directly about his comments. "During our one-on-ones, 12 or 15 of them said, 'We appreciate the apology, and it meant a lot to us.'" The women also got the chance to let their feelings be known during a date that included a comedy roast. "One of the dates was a roast. It was brutal. They were killing me," he said. "One said, 'Oh, when Mel was walking with me, he was using me as a cane.' And I'm from Detroit, right? One said, 'Like a Detroit pizza, he's doughy, squishy, square, and crusty.'" "It was good because I earned that, and I took it and I deserved it, and it landed squarely on me. They were throwing haymakers. It was good." The reality star told host Jon Jansen he was looking for someone who is "fit because I'm staying in shape and work out and stuff." Michael Buckner/Variety via Getty "And I told them, 'Try to stay away from the artificial hips and the wigs, you know, that kind of stuff, right?'" he said on the June podcast episode. Owens also hoped that his new leading lady would be a "lifetime learner," who likes to "work out, stay fit, eat, have fun, be energetic and live life." Selling SunsetstarChrishell Stauseresponded on her Instagram Stories on June 26, writing, "We love theGolden Bachelorbecause of how wholesome it is. This type of energy will ruin it," perParade. "That kinda negates the 'golden' part. Sounds more like middle-aged bachelor," one fan shared onX. Anotheradded, "It's fine, but just because men think it, do they have to say it? It's so cringe." The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now! On April 22, ABC announced Mel Owens would be the new lead when the ABC series returns this fall, following in the footsteps ofGerry Turner, who served as the inaugural Golden Bachelor in 2023. Following the announcement, Owens told hostJesse Palmerthat he wants to find "someone that's honest, charming, loving, fit. Someone full of life because it's go time." Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The Golden Bacheloris set to return this fall on ABC. Read the original article onPeople

“Golden Bachelor” Mel Owens Speaks Out After His Controversial Comments About Not Dating Women Over 60

"Golden Bachelor" Mel Owens Speaks Out After His Controversial Comments About Not Dating Women Over 60 Taylor Hill/FilmMagic New G...
Why Did Lindsay Lohan Leave the United States? All About the "Freakier Friday "Star's Overseas Move

Olivia Wong/Getty Lindsay Lohan has been living in Dubai since 2015 The actress first posted a photo with her now-husband, Bader Shammas, there TheFreakier Fridaystar enjoys the "privacy" of the city Freakier FridaystarLindsay Lohanhas left Hollywood behind for Dubai. TheMean Girlsstar was born in New York City, and over the years, she would also call Los Angeles andLondonhome. She even spent some time in Mykonos, Greece, opening her ownbeach club(which was chronicled on the MTV docuseriesLindsay Lohan's Beach Club). However, since 2015,The Parent Trapactress has been settled in Dubai. The United Arab Emirates might be far away from the Hollywood spotlight, but Lohan's day-to-day is filled with the "same thingsthat any normal mom would do in their daily life. Or you would do in L.A.," as she toldFlauntin November 2024. "The only difference is the time zone shift," she said. "There's a big disconnect between when work starts for me and other places. I can do my work calls with New York at like three or four ... and then L.A. picks up later." So why did theFreakier Fridaystar leave the U.S., and does she have any plans on moving back? Here's what to know about Lindsay Lohan's life in Dubai. David M. Benett/Getty for LOVE x Balmain Lohan moved to Dubai in 2015. Before that, she had been living in London, as she toldAllurein June 2023. "I guess you would say it happened organically," she told the publication. "Dubai gives me that space to have my own vision of what I need to do next." Since relocating to Dubai, Lohan has gotten married and started a family. In 2022, she married financier Bader Shammas, who is based in the city. They welcomed a son, Luai, in July 2023. Jamie McCarthy/Getty TheParent Trapalum has said that being a constant target of the paparazzi prompted her move to Dubai. In a July 2025 episode ofLive with Kelly and Mark, Lohan said she feels "very safe" in Dubai. When Kelly Ripa asked Lohan if the paparazzi has a presence there, the actress responded, "No, it'snot legal." "You can't take a picture of someone else if you're in a restaurant," she explained. "You have to ask the person, which is a big difference from here. Privacy is key." Amy Sussman/Getty Like Lohan, Shammas is based in Dubai. The two met at a restaurant there, as the actress revealed toAllure. According to Lohan, after talking for hours that night, she told Shammas, "I feel like you're the person I'm going to be with forever." The two have been married since 2022. Lindsay Lohan/Instagram Lohan enjoys living a private life in Dubai. In a December 2017Entertainment Tonightinterview, theLife Sizeactress said, "I love living in New York, but I do love the serenity and peace that I find living in the Middle East because there are no cameras in Dubai and I can actually focus on what I want to do in life." Lohan explained how she found relief not being "scrutinized every second." "I can have a private life and have a public life, but when I choose to. I think that's really important," she added. Jamie McCarthy/Getty for Disney Lohan has not spoken about moving back to the U.S., but in a May 2025 interview withChloe FinemanforElle, she revealed that she spent "less than half" of 2024 in Dubai. "I want to spend more time there. It is nice to have a balance. But my husband and I are always like, 'Okay, we have until he's 5,' " she said, referring to her son. When Fineman followed up by asking, "And then?" Lohan responded, "We have to figure out where he's going to go to school. That's the main thing." Read the original article onPeople

Why Did Lindsay Lohan Leave the United States? All About the “Freakier Friday ”Star's Overseas Move

Why Did Lindsay Lohan Leave the United States? All About the "Freakier Friday "Star's Overseas Move Olivia Wong/Getty Lindsay ...
Undocumented children will be barred from Head Start preschool under new Trump ruleNew Foto - Undocumented children will be barred from Head Start preschool under new Trump rule

Undocumented children will no longer qualify for federally funded preschool through the Head Start program under a major policy shift the Trump administration announced Thursday. In a news release, the Department of Health and Human Services said it wasrescinding a nearly 30-year-old interpretation of federal lawissued under President Bill Clinton that allowed undocumented immigrants to access certain programs because they were not considered "federal public benefits." As President Donald Trump pursues his anti-immigrant agenda, this change may be the most direct and far-reaching effort to target children after hisattempts to end birthright citizenship. His administration has alsoramped up immigration enforcementanddeportations,withheld funding for English learners, andthreatened to punish states that offer in-state tuition to undocumented college students. Administration officials have said theyhope many immigrants will "self-deport" if the United States makes life here more uncomfortable. Health and Human Services leaders cast the change as a way to protect benefits for Americans. "For too long, the government has diverted hardworking Americans' tax dollars to incentivize illegal immigration," Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in a press release. "Today's action changes that — it restores integrity to federal social programs, enforces the rule of law, and protects vital resources for the American people." Early childhood education advocates, meanwhile, condemned the change as violating both the spirit and the letter of the 1965 law that authorized Head Start. They also warned the change could scare away eligible families,Chalkbeatreports. "This decision undermines the fundamental commitment that the country has made to children," Yasmina Vinci, the executive director of the National Head Start Association, a nonprofit that represents Head Start staff and families, saidin a written statement. "Head Start programs strive to make every child feel welcome, safe, and supported, and reject the characterization of any child as 'illegal.'" The change is also at odds with how the Supreme Court has treated K-12 education. In thelandmark Plyler v. Doe decisionfrom 1982, the justices ruled that children have a right to a free public education regardless of immigration status. However, the courts have upheld laws restricting immigrants' access to welfare benefits. Head Start provided preschool to over 544,000 children from low-income families,according to the latest federal datafrom the 2022-23 school year, while Early Head Start served more than 186,000 infants, toddlers, and expectant parents. The program, which is celebrating its 60th anniversary this year,has reached 40 million children but has recently faced a number of challenges, from federal staff layoffs to threats of eliminating the program. Head Start will now be considered a public benefit, the Trump administration said, because it offers services that are similar to welfare. Officials said the change aligns with Trump's executive orders, including aFebruary order titled "Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders." "While Head Start provides for school readiness, it also provides low-income children and their families with 'health, educational, nutritional, and social and other services, that are determined based on family needs assessment,'"federal officials wrote in a notice announcing the change. "Further, it may serve as child care for parents of young children." Classifying Head Start as welfare, rather than education, could be a Trump administration strategy to avoid having to address whether the protections extended to undocumented children in Plyler apply here, said Nate Ela, an assistant professor of law at Temple University, in an email. Reflecting Trump's America First agenda, Health and Human Services officials said in their press release that Head Start will be "reserved for American citizens from now on." But a spokesperson for the Administration for Children and Families clarified that U.S. citizen children and "qualified" immigrant children would be eligible for Head Start.Under federal law, that includes legal permanent residents, children who've been granted asylum, refugees, and children with humanitarian parole. In its statement, the National Head Start Association said providers were alarmed that programs would have to check the citizenship or immigration status of children before they could enroll. The law that governs Head Start has never required documentation of immigration status as a condition to enroll, the organization said, and "attempts to impose such a requirement threaten to create fear and confusion among all families." It is unclear exactly how the new rules will be enforced. Guidance based on the new legal interpretation is forthcoming, the Administration for Children and Families spokesperson said. "​​Are they going to monitor us when they come out for their federal review?" asked Lauri Morrison-Frichtl, the executive director of the Illinois Head Start Association. "Will there be something attached to our grant that we have to certify?" The latest version of the law governing who is eligible for Head Start says nothing about immigration status, but it does say that the program can use federal funds to train staff, counsel children, and provide other services that are "necessary to address the challenges of children from immigrant, refugee, and asylee families, homeless children, children in foster care, limited English proficient children, children of migrant or seasonal farmworker families, [and] children from families in crisis." The law says that children who are experiencing homelessness or whose families have incomes below the federal poverty line qualify. The Migrant Seasonal Head Start program also guarantees child care for the children of farm workers and seasonal workers. This is not the first attempt to roll back educational rights for immigrant children and families.A number of Republican state legislators have backed bills that would limit enrollmentfor immigrant children or track their immigration status in ways that could intimidate families. So far, none has been successful. Meanwhile, the author of a brief from the conservative Heritage Foundation thatcalled on states to charge undocumented children tuition to attend public schoolnowworks in the Education Department. Federal officials estimated that the Head Start change would free up $374 million a year for U.S. citizens and qualified immigrants to access Head Start, which represents about 3% of the program's annual budget in recent years. But keeping children out of Head Start could lead to more costs down the road for public schools, advocates warned. Kindergartners who don't go to preschool may need more help with basics like learning their ABCs, colors, and how to work with classmates. They also may have missed out on health screenings. "We're really shortchanging our community by cutting them off from strong early childhood programs that are going to put them on the right path to be successful in K-12 schools where they have a guaranteed right to attend," said Xilonin Cruz-Gonzalez, co-founder of the National Newcomer Network and deputy director of Californians Together, groups that advocate for immigrant rights in education. There are typically many more children in poverty who qualify for Head Start than the program has funding to serve.A 2024 Government Accountability Office report found, for example, that for every 100 young children in poverty, there were typically 28 Head Start seats, with much larger gaps in some states. Keeping out immigrant children wouldn't necessarily close those gaps. The main factor limiting Head Start seats is a lack of trained teachers, said Diane Schilder, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute, a public policy think tank. "A lot of programs are having challenges hiring teachers in preschool and infant-toddler classrooms who meet the requirements because the wages are not adequate," Schilder said. Low-income families are less likely to have documents proving their children are citizens, Schilder said, andanti-immigrant sentimentcan scare away even eligible families from applying. Parents are less likely to work when they don't have access to child care. The effects of these changes would be felt most strongly in urban areas and in communities with a large agricultural workforce. Head Start providers worry that verifying children's immigration status will create more administrative work and could make it harder for all families to enroll. Federal officials estimated the cost of assembling documents and reviewing paperwork would be an additional $21 million a year. And there would be more transition costs to change Head Start protocols, the federal notice stated. Federal officials said the change would take effect as soon as it is published in the Federal Register. It has not been published, but has been submitted, the Trump administration said. The public will have 30 days to submit comments. For now, Heather Frenz, the executive director of the Colorado Head Start Association, said her organization is telling Head Start providers to wait for further instructions before un-enrolling any children. Reconsidering the eligibility or enrollment of children who are already attending Head Start would be expensive and time-consuming, Frenz said. The process involves everything from measuring children's height and weight to drawing up individual plans. And if undocumented children miss out on preschool and other services Head Start provides, Frenz said it could "put a lot of strain" on other public entities when those children get older. "They may not speak English or have never seen a dentist," Frenz said. "That's going to be a heavy load on the public school education system." Chalkbeat New York reporter Michael Elsen-Rooney, Chalkbeat Philadelphia bureau chief Carly Sitrin, Chalkbeat Chicago bureau chief Becky Vevea, and Colorado bureau chief Melanie Asmar contributed reporting. This storywas produced byChalkbeatand reviewed and distributed byStacker.

Undocumented children will be barred from Head Start preschool under new Trump rule

Undocumented children will be barred from Head Start preschool under new Trump rule Undocumented children will no longer qualify for federal...
Colombia ex-president Uribe sentenced to 12 years of house arrest, document showsNew Foto - Colombia ex-president Uribe sentenced to 12 years of house arrest, document shows

By Luis Jaime Acosta BOGOTA (Reuters) -Former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe was sentenced on Friday to 12 years of house arrest for abuse of process and bribery of a public official, according to a sentencing document seen by Reuters and a source with knowledge of the matter. Uribe was convicted of the two charges on Monday by Judge Sandra Liliana Heredia in a witness-tampering case that has run for about 13 years. He has always maintained his innocence. The sentencing document, also published by local media, came hours ahead of the hearing where Heredia will read the sentence in court. Uribe will also be fined $578,000, the document showed, and barred from public office for more than eight years. Uribe, whose legal team has said he will appeal the ruling, is to report to authorities in Rionegro, in Antioquia province, where he resides, and then "proceed immediately to his residence where he will comply with house arrest," the document said. The conviction made him the country's first ex-president to ever be found guilty at trial and came less than a year before Colombia's 2026 presidential election, in which several of Uribe's allies and proteges are competing for top office. It could also have implications for Colombia's relationship with the United States. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said this week that Uribe's conviction was a "weaponization of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges" and analysts have said there could be cuts to U.S. aid in response. Uribe, 73, and his supporters have always said the process is a persecution, while his detractors have celebrated it as deserved comeuppance for a man who has been accused for decades of close ties with violent right-wing paramilitaries but never convicted of any crime until now. TESTIMONIES FROM FORMER PARAMILITARIES Uribe, who was president from 2002 to 2010 and oversaw a military offensive against leftist guerrillas, was charged over allegations he ordered a lawyer to bribe jailed paramilitaries to discredit claims he had ties to their organizations. Those claims stemmed from leftist Senator Ivan Cepeda, who collected testimonies from former paramilitaries who said Uribe had supported their organizations in Antioquia, where he once served as governor. Uribe alleged in 2012 that Cepeda orchestrated the testimonies in a plot to tie him to the paramilitaries, but the Supreme Court ruled six years later that Cepeda had not paid or pressured the ex-paramilitaries. Instead, the court said it was Uribe and his allies who pressured the witnesses. Cepeda has been classed as a victim in the case and attended Monday's hearing. Two jailed former paramilitaries testified that Diego Cadena, the lawyer formerly representing Uribe, offered them money to testify in Uribe's favor. Cadena, who is also facing charges, has denied the accusations and testified, along with several other ex-paramilitaries, on Uribe's behalf. Each charge carried a potential sentence of six to 12 years. Uribe, who was placed under house arrest for two months in 2020, is head of the powerful Democratic Center party and was a senator for years both before and after his presidency. He has repeatedly emphasized that he extradited paramilitary leaders to the United States. Colombia's truth commission says paramilitary groups, which demobilized under deals with Uribe's government, killed more than 205,000 people, nearly half of the 450,000 deaths recorded during the ongoing civil conflict. Paramilitaries, along with guerrilla groups and members of the armed forces, also committed forced disappearances, sexual violence, displacement and other crimes. Uribe joins a list of Latin American leaders who have been convicted and sometimes jailed, including Peru's Alberto Fujimori, Brazil's Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Ecuador's Rafael Correa, Argentina's Cristina Fernandez and Panama's Ricardo Martinelli. (Reporting by Carlos Vargas and Luis Jaime Acosta, additional reporting by Nelson BocanegraWriting by Julia Symmes CobbEditing by Rosalba O'Brien)

Colombia ex-president Uribe sentenced to 12 years of house arrest, document shows

Colombia ex-president Uribe sentenced to 12 years of house arrest, document shows By Luis Jaime Acosta BOGOTA (Reuters) -Former Colombian P...
King Charles cried the night before marrying Princess Diana, knowing he loved Camilla: expertNew Foto - King Charles cried the night before marrying Princess Diana, knowing he loved Camilla: expert

King Charles reportedly wept the night before marrying Princess Diana, knowing he was still in love with his ex, Camilla. But he wasn't the only one to shed tears. "They both [cried]," royal expert Ian Pelham Turner told Fox News Digital, referring to doomed couple Charles and Diana. "Diana was reluctant about marrying Charles but was told by her sister it was too late. The tea towels with their joint images were already being sold. Charles was given cufflinks with a Camilla insignia, which he wore on his wedding day so that she could be included, which allegedly made him emotional." Kate Middleton Channels Princess Diana In Striking Blue Outfit At Trooping The Colour Turner's claims came shortly afterPeople magazinelooked back at Charles and Diana's royal wedding July 29, 1981. "According to the biography 'Prince Charles: The Passions and Paradoxes of an Improbable Life,' Charles felt pressured into his marriage to Diana and was still torn about his love for the then-married Camilla," the outlet shared. "He even cried over it the night before his nuptials." Read On The Fox News App British royals expert Hilary Fordwichtold Fox News Digital the book's author, Sally Bedell Smith, told her that Charles did cry the night before marrying Diana. "In covering the king's coronation [in 2023], I was live on set with Sally Bedell Smith," she said. "I asked her about himcrying the night before his wedding, which she confirmed." While the explosive marriage of Charles and Diana is well documented, Fordwich said the younger royals of today should be grateful that they won't have to ever endure similar heartache. "The tumultuous love triangle of Charles, Diana and Camilla is an infamously sad study of the clash between traditional royal duty versus personal fulfillment and happiness at the heart of Britain's monarchy," Fordwich explained. "Then-Prince Charles reportedly told his friends he felt compelled by his father, Prince Philip, to marry Diana not due to deep love, but rather to comply with royal convention. Click Here To Sign Up For The Entertainment Newsletter "He had to marry a virginal, suitable bride who would meet public expectations of a future queen," she shared. "Camilla was regarded as completely 'unsuitable' due to her many previous relationships and marital status. Certainly, the Church of England wouldn't permit the heir to the throne to marry a divorcee. "His godmother, Patricia Mountbatten, said he realized he was 'too committed' to back out of marrying Diana," Fordwich continued. "Still, she knew he was making a mistake given his love for Camilla, who remained his soulmate despite being married to another man." Charles met Camilla in 1970 through mutual friend Lucia Santa Cruz. According to reports, Charles was instantly smitten. Despite a blossoming romance, Charles joined the Navy in 1971. While Charles was serving, Camilla married Andrew Parker Bowles, an ex-boyfriend of the royal's younger sister, Princess Anne, in 1973. According to reports, a devastated Charles tried to stop Camilla from marrying Parker Bowles, but the pair remained friends. As the former lovers stayed close,Charles began courting Lady Diana Spencerin 1980. "By the time Charles married Diana, supposedly, Camilla's physical relationship with him had ceased," said Fordwich. "However, their emotional bond continued, for which both were derided. The tabloids termed her 'the other woman.'" And it was easy for Diana to see that Camilla continued to play an important role in the life of the man she was going to marry. Like What You're Reading? Click Here For More Entertainment News "At first, Diana professed to be very much in love with Charles but expressed to many she felt foolish and jealous once she fully grasped his emotional attachment to Camilla," Fordwich explained. "The press, both sides of the family and even her Spencer sisters made it clear to her that she simply couldn't back out of the wedding once her face was 'on the tea towels.' … The entire nation and the world were giddy with excitement regarding their imminent wedding. "On her wedding day … the public speculated her sleepless look was due to wedding nerves. No one was aware of her knowing of Camilla's place in Charles' heart, which rendered her distraught. "Diana later described feeling she was 'the luckiest girl in the world,' but she also knew Charles' true affections lay elsewhere," Fordwich continued. "Her emotional turmoil would damage not only the rest of their marriage but, to this day, it hasramifications in Prince Harry's behavior, given his deep-rooted resentment of Camilla as well as his mistrust of the media." Camilla made the royal wedding's guest list, likely due to her husband's role as the Commanding Officer of the Household Cavalry Mounted Regiment, People magazine reported. While several reports claimed Camilla wore white during the ceremony, catching Diana's eye, royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams clarified to Fox News Digital that she wore a "pale gray dress with a veiled pillbox hat." WATCH: PRINCESS DIANA TOLD QUEEN ELIZABETH KING CHARLES WAS A NIGHTMARE: AUTHOR Problems only worsened during Charles and Diana's honeymoon. "From the start, the public preferred the princess, though privately she was angst-ridden and bulimic," said Fitzwilliams. "It does seem that fate almost inexorably decreed that, once it had been set in motion, it was impossible to call the wedding off. Diana's discovery of a bracelet Charles had bought for Camilla before the wedding worsened her suspicions that she had a dangerous rival." "The divide between Charles and Diana was exacerbated by the gulf between their respective ages, their completely different interests, as well as their worldviews," added Fordwich. "Even on their honeymoon, they reportedly had some rather major personality clashes. Later, there was the lurid scandal of 1989 that exposed Charles and Camilla's ongoing affair. It shocked the public and irreparably damaged Charles' reputation." "The British public hasn't forgotten," Fordwich added. Charles and Diana separated in 1992. In 1995, Diana gave a bombshell interview to BBC's Panorama during which she declared, "Well, there were three of us in this marriage, so it was a bit crowded." Their divorce was finalized in 1996. Charles and Camilla rekindled their romance after Diana died in 1997. They married in 2005. The couplewere crowned king and queenin 2023. Original article source:King Charles cried the night before marrying Princess Diana, knowing he loved Camilla: expert

King Charles cried the night before marrying Princess Diana, knowing he loved Camilla: expert

King Charles cried the night before marrying Princess Diana, knowing he loved Camilla: expert King Charles reportedly wept the night before ...

 

ALPHA MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com