Comedian Matt Rife buys home of couple who inspired "The Conjuring", becomes 'guardian' of haunted Annabelle doll

Matt Rife is pivoting to the paranormal, at least when it comes to his new pad. The stand-up comedian has bought the former house of Ed and Lorraine Warren, the ghost hunters who inspired the couple played byPatrick WilsonandVera FarmigainThe Conjuringfranchise. "I have officially purchased Ed and Lorraine Warren's home and Occult Museum," Rifewrote on Instagramon Friday, noting that he has become "the legal guardian, for at least the next five years, of the entire haunted collection, including THE ANNABELLE DOLL." In a separatevideo on TikTok, Rife explained the significance of his decision. "This might be the most important and prominent piece of paranormal history in the world," he said. "I know a lot of you guys don't know what any of this means whatsoever, but if you follow ghost stuff, this is as big as it gets." Michael Tackett/ Warner Bros The comedian also clarified that while he does own the physical house, he does not own its various curios. "We are the legal guardians and caretakers of all 750 haunted artifacts and items in the Warren Museum, including the Annabelle doll," he said. "We do not legally own the items, but we are the legal guardians and caretakers of the items for at least the next five years." Rife obtained Annabelle shortly after Dan Rivera, an investigator for the New England Society for Psychic Research,died suddenlywhile showcasing the infamous Raggedy Ann doll in July. The NESPR, which the Warrens founded,claimsthat the doll was at one point attached to "an inhuman demonic spirit." Matt Rife/ Instagram Annabelle inspired the opening scene ofThe Conjuringin 2013, and eventually launched a trilogy of spinoff films: 2014'sAnnabelle, 2017'sAnnabelle: Creation, and 2019'sAnnabelle Comes Home, the last of which took place exclusively in the Warrens' oddity-filled family residence. Rife said his affection for theConjuringmovies inspired his massive purchase. "If you know me, you know I'm obsessed with the paranormal and all things haunted," he wrote on Instagram. "You also may know theConjuringfilms are my favorite scary movies of all time. So I'm incredibly honored to have taken over one of the most prominent properties in paranormal history." Russell McPhedran/Fairfax Media via Getty The comedian went on to claim that the Warrens "arguably put demonology and paranormal into the mainstream" and noted that they "are the very heart of some of the most famous haunted stories of all time," includingThe ConjuringandThe Amityville Horror. Rife also explained that he and his friend Elton Castee, who is taking on the venture with him, intend to ensure that the Warrens' property will still host visitors. "We plan to open the house for overnight stays and museum tours, so you yourself can experience and learn all the haunted history surrounding this amazing place," he wrote. Pictures/courtesy Everett Collection Want more movie news? Sign up forEntertainment Weekly's free newsletterto get the latest trailers, celebrity interviews, film reviews, and more. In his TikTok, Rife acknowledged the potential supernatural risk he took by purchasing the house. "This is the most random hobby ever, but it's so f---ing cool, man," he said. "I should probably collect stamps or something — might be a little safer." The fictional version of the Warrens will return to the big screen inThe Conjuring: Last Rites, which Farmiga recentlytoldEntertainment Weeklywill be her final outing in the series. "It is the end of the road. It's got to be the end of the road," she said. "I would literally explode on camera. WhatLast Ritesdemanded of us physically, emotionally, mentally, stamina-wise... It's been a long haul, man. It's been a really, really long haul, but it's time." The Conjuring: Last Riteshits theaters Sept. 5. Read the original article onEntertainment Weekly

Comedian Matt Rife buys home of couple who inspired “The Conjuring”, becomes 'guardian' of haunted Annabelle doll

Comedian Matt Rife buys home of couple who inspired "The Conjuring", becomes 'guardian' of haunted Annabelle doll Matt Rif...
Prince Harry Denies 'Physical Fight' with Prince Andrew and Comments About Meghan Markle in Explosive New BookNew Foto - Prince Harry Denies 'Physical Fight' with Prince Andrew and Comments About Meghan Markle in Explosive New Book

Samir Hussein/WireImage;Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Prince Harry denies claims he physically fought Prince Andrew at a 2013 family gathering A new book alleges Andrew made critical remarks about Meghan Markle to Harry, which Harry denies The book also claims Prince William seeks to remove Andrew from Royal Lodge amid ongoing family tensions Prince Harryis pushing back on explosive claims in a new book alleging he once got into a physical altercation with his unclePrince Andrew— and thatMeghan Marklewas the subject of behind-the-scenes insults. A spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex tells PEOPLE, "I can confirm neither of those things are true. Prince Harry and Prince Andrew have never had a physical fight, nor did Prince Andrew ever make those comments about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry." The denial comes in response to a new book,Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, which alleges that a "heated argument" between Harry and Andrew broke out at a family gathering in 2013 over "something Andrew said behind Harry's back," reportedly escalating to the point where "punches were thrown" and Andrew was left with a bloody nose. The book also claims that Andrew privately questioned Harry's relationship with Meghan, calling her an "opportunist" and suggesting the marriage wouldn't last. PEOPLE has reached out to the palace for comment. WPA Pool/Getty According to the book by author Andrew Lownie, with an excerpt published in theDaily Mail, tensions between Prince Andrew and both of his nephews have simmered for years. It further alleges thatPrince Williamhas worked behind the scenes to push Andrew out of Royal Lodge, the Windsor estate he continues to occupy, and has privately expressed disdain for Andrew and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson. The book portrays Andrew as a controversial figure and delves into his ties with convicted sex offenderJeffrey Epstein. Andrew has been largely stripped of official duties and stepped back from public life amid intense scrutiny and reputational damage. The new book marks the latest in a series of controversial publications chronicling the royal family's internal rifts, many of which have only deepened since Harry and Meghan's 2020 decision to step back from royal duties and relocate to California. Mark Cuthbert/UK Press via Getty Harry and Meghan, now raising their two children in Montecito, have largely focused on their philanthropic and entrepreneurial endeavors. Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage?Sign up for our free Royals newsletterto get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more! Despite longstanding tensions within the family, Prince Harry has expressed a desire for reconciliation, while remaining steadfastly focused on protecting his wife and children. "I would love reconciliation with my family. There's no point in continuing to fight anymore,"Prince Harry told the BBC in May. Read the original article onPeople

Prince Harry Denies ‘Physical Fight’ with Prince Andrew and Comments About Meghan Markle in Explosive New Book

Prince Harry Denies 'Physical Fight' with Prince Andrew and Comments About Meghan Markle in Explosive New Book Samir Hussein/WireIma...
Court limits Trump's asylum crackdown at the U.S.-Mexico borderNew Foto - Court limits Trump's asylum crackdown at the U.S.-Mexico border

A panel of federal judges on Friday limited President Trump's effort to close theU.S. asylum systemat the southern border, saying his administration can't unilaterally suspend laws that bar the U.S. from deporting migrants to places where they would face persecution or torture. Therulingcenters on a proclamation issued by Mr. Trump just hours after he returned to the White House in January, ordering the closure of theasylum system. U.S. border officials have relied on the order to summarily expel those entering the country illegally, without allowing them to request asylum. Mr. Trump justified the sweeping measure on the grounds that the country is facing an "invasion" of migrants. The three-judge panel at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit lifted its administrative pause on a July ruling from a federal judge who found Mr. Trump's proclamation defied U.S. laws that require the federal government to hear the claims of migrants who want to apply for humanitarian protection out of fear that they could be harmed if deported. That ruling by U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss struck down the Trump administration's asylum ban and would've required officials to stop enforcing it on a legal class comprised of migrants who are or will be in the U.S. While it lifted its stay on Moss' ruling, the D.C. Circuit panel also narrowed his order, limiting the class members eligible for relief to asylum-seekers already on American soil while Mr. Trump's decree is in effect. The appellate court also limited the scope of Moss' ruling, partially granting a request from the Trump administration. The panel allowed the Trump administration to continue using the president's proclamation to deny migrants access to the U.S. asylum system, noting that U.S. law permits, but does not require, the government to grant asylum to those who prove they could be persecuted because of their race, religion, politics or other factors. But the panel also said Mr. Trump's proclamation could not be used to prevent migrants from applying for other forms of humanitarian protections that the U.S. is legally required to give to certain migrants fleeing persecution and torture. They're known as "withholding of removal" and protection under the United Nations Convention Against Torture. Those protections have a higher legal threshold than asylum, but unlike asylum, they are mandatory, not discretionary, and must be granted to those who meet the requirements. The panel was made up of Circuit Judges Patricia Millett and Cornelia Pillard, who were appointed by former President Barack Obama, as well as Gregory G. Katsas, an appointee of Mr. Trump. Each judge filed their own statements in the case, with Pillard and Katsas disagreeing with some aspects of the ruling. While they had some disagreements, all three judges said Mr. Trump's proclamation could not be used to ignore laws around "withholding of removal" or Convention Against Torture protections. Pillard said she would've also blocked the administration from denying migrants the right to apply for asylum. The judges scheduled expedited proceedings to decide the merits of the case, asking both the government and the advocates challenging Mr. Trump's proclamation to file briefs through Sept. 26. The lawsuit that triggered Friday's decision was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and other advocates, who have denounced the Trump administration's border crackdown as a draconian policy that has sent migrants to harm's way. "The President secured the border in record time at an unprecedented level by using every available legal tool provided by Congress," Assistant DHS Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told CBS News in a statement on Saturday. "A rogue district judge took those tools away, threatening the safety and security of Americans and ignoring a Supreme Court decision issued only days earlier admonishing district courts for granting nationwide injunctions. The Trump Administration is committed to restoring integrity to our immigration system and to our justice system." Trump administration officials have credited the president's proclamation and other actions — including the deployment of thousands of additional troops to the southern border — for a historic drop in illegal crossings there. In July, just 4,600 migrants were caught crossing the southern border illegally, the lowest monthly tally recorded by Border Patrol and a figure the Biden administration reported daily during many months. While public monthly reports started in fiscal year 2000, annual data suggest the last time Border Patrol had that level of apprehensions was in the 1960s. Black swimmers teach others amid history of aquatic segregation Arkansas officials reveal new details about Devil's Den murders of husband and wife Saturday Sessions: The Swell Season performs "Great Weight"

Court limits Trump's asylum crackdown at the U.S.-Mexico border

Court limits Trump's asylum crackdown at the U.S.-Mexico border A panel of federal judges on Friday limited President Trump's effort...
Freeze-dried fruit sold at Sam's Club recalled over listeria riskNew Foto - Freeze-dried fruit sold at Sam's Club recalled over listeria risk

Boxes of freeze-dried fruit sold at Sam's Club retail stores have been recalled due to possible listeria contamination, according to aU.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) notice. Doehler Dry Ingredient Solutions, LLCissued the recall for Member's Mark Freeze Dried Fruit Variety Pack 15-count boxes due to the potential contamination of the organism that can "cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems," the FDA notice says. As of Thursday, July 31, the date the recall was published, no illnesses have been reported due to the possible contamination. The freeze-dried fruit was shipped to distribution centers in Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Wyoming. According to the notice, the Cartersville, Georgia-based company discovered the possible listeria via internal testing of its products. The recalled freeze-dried fruit was distributed between July 1 and July 25 and sold in Sam's Club retail locations. The products were packaged in foil pouches inside a corrugated box, which had the lot number and expiration date located on the bottom, according to the notice. The recalled products are all 15-count Member's Mark Freeze-Dried Fruit Variety Packs with the UPC 1 93968 50900 2 and use-by dates ranging from June 24, 2027, to July 25, 2027, according to the notice. According to theCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), symptoms of listeria infection include: Fever Flu-like symptoms, such as muscle aches and fatigue Headache Stiff neck Confusion Loss of balance Seizures The FDA warns that while healthy individuals may suffer only short-term symptoms, such as high fever, severe headache, stiffness, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea, a listeria infection can cause miscarriages and stillbirths among pregnant women. Consumers who have the recalled freeze-dried fruit in their possession should not consume the product, according to the FDA, adding that they "should discard it and may visit any Sam's Club for a full refund." Anyone with questions can contact Doehler Dry Ingredient Solutions, LLC's Customer Service at 770-387-0451 from Monday to Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. EST. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Freeze-dried fruit sold at Sam's Club recalled

Freeze-dried fruit sold at Sam's Club recalled over listeria risk

Freeze-dried fruit sold at Sam's Club recalled over listeria risk Boxes of freeze-dried fruit sold at Sam's Club retail stores have ...
George Lopez Calls His Alleged Social Media Ban by the L.A. Dodgers 'Hurtful' (Exclusive)New Foto - George Lopez Calls His Alleged Social Media Ban by the L.A. Dodgers 'Hurtful' (Exclusive)

Paul Archuleta/Getty George Lopez — who alleges the L.A. Dodgers banned him on social media — called the response "hurtful" while recently speaking to PEOPLE The comedian has been an outspoken critic of the team's silence on recent ICE raids within the city The Dodgers have not publicly commented on Lopez's ban George Lopezis opening up about his strained relationship with the Los Angeles Dodgers. The lifelong Dodgers fan alleges the team blocked him on social media after he publicly criticized their lack of response toICE raidswithin their home city. Lopez, 64, has consistentlyvoiced outrageover the controversial raids, and previously called on the MLB team to voice their support for immigrants and people of Latino descent within their community. While recently speaking exclusively to PEOPLE atThe Hollywood Reporterand Social Impact Fund's 2025 Social Impact Summit, the comedian admitted that the alleged social media block didn't feel good. "It's hurtful," he told PEOPLE. https://people-app.onelink.me/HNIa/kz7l4cuf On July 12, Lopez posted avideoof himself dancing on Instagram, with the words, "POV: You just got blocked by the Dodgers" written over the footage. "The Dodgers blocked me on social media for my criticism of the team, so they'll take a stand on me, but not on the treatment of the families who called Chavez Ravine Home before they decided to build a baseball stadium where they lived and where their families called home," he captioned the post. Chavez Ravine was a former neighborhood in L.A. that was largely populated by Mexican-American residents and other minorities. The majority of the community wasforcibly displacedin the 1950s to make way for Dodger Stadium — despite the fact that the land was originally intended to be used for affordable housing. Monica Schipper/The Hollywood Reporter via Getty Lopez added, "Also no comment from the [team's] owners. what's happening everyday to the families of the people who are being treated like they don't belong. If anyone doesnt belong it's the dodgers." PEOPLE reached out to the Dodgers for comment but did not receive an immediate response. While the Dodgers have not commented publicly on the ICE raids specifically, the team pledged $1 million for families of immigrants "impacted by recent events in the region," per a June 21ststatement. Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "What's happening in Los Angeles has reverberated among thousands upon thousands of people, and we have heard the calls for us to take a leading role on behalf of those affected," Stan Kasten, President & CEO, Los Angeles Dodgers, said. "We believe that by committing resources and taking action, we will continue to support and uplift the communities of Greater Los Angeles," he added. Read the original article onPeople

George Lopez Calls His Alleged Social Media Ban by the L.A. Dodgers 'Hurtful' (Exclusive)

George Lopez Calls His Alleged Social Media Ban by the L.A. Dodgers 'Hurtful' (Exclusive) Paul Archuleta/Getty George Lopez — who al...

 

ALPHA MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com