Young adults are less likely to follow politics or say voting is important: AP-NORC pollNew Foto - Young adults are less likely to follow politics or say voting is important: AP-NORC poll

WASHINGTON (AP) — Mairekk Griffiths, a 26-year-old cook in a Denver suburb, doesn't think he'll ever pay a lot of attention toU.S. politicsunless radical change happens. "If another party was likely to win, I'd be interested in that," said Griffiths, who voted for Democrat Kamala Harris inlast year's presidential racebut, like many his age, does not see voting as that valuable. "I can't say either way that voting matters," Griffiths said. "It's just picking the least bad option. That's what I remember my whole life — both sides are bad, but this side is less bad." Young people such as Griffiths are less engaged with U.S. politics than older Americans and less likely to say voting is important, according to a new poll fromThe Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Young people — even those who follow politics closely — are less likely to say issues such as the economy, government spending and health care are "extremely important" to them than comparable older adults. The findings point to a broad sense of disillusionment among younger people about the country's political system — even if, like Griffiths, they still end up casting a ballot. Alberto Medina, who leads the Center for Information and Research on Civic Engagement at Tufts University, which studies youth and politics, noted that turnout among young people hit record levels in the 2020 election and was high last year. "There's a sense that democracy isn't working for young people. There's a lack of belief that democracy is even able to improve their lives," Medina said. "At the same time, we have been living in an era of high youth voting." Disengagement from political parties and politics In another sign of their general estrangement from politics, the poll shows young adults are more likely to reject political party labels. About one-third of adults under age 30 identify as political independents who don't lean toward either major political party, compared with 17% of Americans age 60 or older. The poll also finds young people are far less likely to follow politics closely than older adults are. Only about 2 in 10 of adults under age 30 say they follow U.S. politics "extremely" or "very" closely, compared with about one-third of Americans overall. That's even higher among adults age 60 or older — 45% of this group says they follow U.S. politics at least very closely. Disengagement is higher among teenagers, withan AP-NORC poll from Mayfinding 44% of teens ages 13 to 17 report following U.S. politics "not very closely" or "not closely at all." Meanwhile, about two-thirds of adults under age 30 say it's "extremely" or "very" important to vote, compared with almost 9 in 10 over age 45 who say it's at least "very" important to vote. Some of these habits could shift as people grow older. Younger people traditionally are less likely to vote than older people, and voter participation tends to go up with age. It's possible that engagement with politics could follow a similar pattern. Brittany Diaz, 28, follows politics closely for an unusual reason: Her oldest son, who is 7, is obsessed with the news and watches it every night. Diaz, a Republican who lives in an Albuquerque, New Mexico, suburb, acknowledges that she's unusual among her age group because she decided to start paying attention to politics when she had her first child at 20. "Now that I have kids, I'm like, 'I need to care,'" she said. In closely following politics, Diaz is different from many other women under 30. Women in her age group are less likely than young men to say they follow U.S. politics, the poll finds. About one-quarter of men under 30 say they follow politics "extremely" or "very" closely, compared with 16% of women in the same age group. And about 4 in 10 young women say they follow U.S. politics "not very closely" or "not closely at all" compared with about a quarter of young men. Lower investment in key issues On a few issues, such as the economy and health care, the divide between the youngest and oldest Americans isn't large. About 8 in 10 Americans under age 30 say the economy is "extremely" or "very" important to them personally, compared with about 9 in 10 Americans age 60 or older. But older adults are much likelier to say topics that have taken center stage during the first six months ofPresident Donald Trump's second term — includingimmigrationand government spending — are "extremely" or "very" important to them personally compared with Americans under 30. That's even true for topics such as the situation in the Middle East, which has become a rallying cry for young activists sincethe Israel-Hamas warbroke out. Only about 4 in 10 adults under 30 say this is highly important to them personally, compared with about 6 in 10 Americans age 60 or older. For some, that lack of interest could be related to a sense that the political system doesn't respond to their needs. At 18, Blake Marlar is just starting to pay attention to politics. AsTrump's tax cut and spending billmoved through the Republican-controlled Congress, the aspiring geology major at the University of Nebraska emailed his state's two senators, both Republicans, objecting to itsMedicaid cutsand increases inimmigration enforcement funding. "They didn't seem to take me seriously," Marlar said. "While I recognize they have to represent the whole state and the whole state doesn't agree with me, it could have been a different experience." But he's resolved not to give up on politics: "In the future," he said, "I'll do my part and vote." ___ Riccardi reported from Denver. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,437 adults was conducted July 10-14, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 3.6 percentage points.

Young adults are less likely to follow politics or say voting is important: AP-NORC poll

Young adults are less likely to follow politics or say voting is important: AP-NORC poll WASHINGTON (AP) — Mairekk Griffiths, a 26-year-old ...
Tennessee to execute Byron Black amid heart device, intellectual disability concernsNew Foto - Tennessee to execute Byron Black amid heart device, intellectual disability concerns

As Angela Clay and hertwo young daughtersslept in their Nashville home, a killer approached. They didn't stand a chance. Clay and her eldest daughter, 9-year-old Latoya, were found shot dead in bed. Clay's other girl, 6-year-old Lakeisha, was found on the floor in another bedroom, killed while apparently trying to escape. Now, 37 years later, Tennesseeis set to executethe man convicted of killing them: Clay's boyfriend,Byron Black. If the execution moves forward on Tuesday, Aug. 5, Black will becomethe 28th inmateput to death in the United States this year,a 10-year high, with at least nine more executions scheduled. The case is unique for two reasons — Black's "undisputed intellectual disability" has many calling for a reprieve, including some Republicans; his attorneys have raised serious questions about whether Black'simplanted heart devicewill cause "a prolonged and torturous execution" in violation of the U.S. Constitution. "Byron's execution carries so many risks," his attorney, Kelley Henry, said in a statement. "He is elderly, frail, and cognitively impaired; there's no principled reason to move forward with this torturous procedure." Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti said in a statement that the state's expert testimony "refused the suggestion that Black would suffer severe pain if executed." "Our office will continue fighting to seek justice for the Clay family and to hold Black accountable for his horrific crimes," Skrmetti said. Here's what you need to know about the murders, the three lives that were shattered, and Black's execution. Black's execution by lethal injection is set for 10 a.m. CT on Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2025, at the Riverbend Maximum Security Institution in Nashville. Black was convicted of fatally shooting his girlfriend, Angela Clay, and her two daughters: 9-year-old Latoya and 6-year-old Lakeisha. They were murdered on March 27, 1988. At the time of the murders, Black had been on work release from prison for shooting Clay's estranged husband and her daughter's father, Bennie Clay, in 1986. Prosecutors told jurors at trial that Black killed Angela Clay because he was jealous of her ongoing relationship with her ex. Investigators believe that Angela Clay and Latoya were shot as they slept, while Lakeisha appeared to have tried to escape after being wounded in the chest and pelvis. Bennie Clay has previously told The Tennessean, part of the USA TODAY Network, that he believes Black killed the girls to spite him. "My kids, they were babies," he told the paper. "They were smart, they were gonna be something. They never got the chance." More recently, Bennie Clay, 68, told The Tennessean that he planned to attend the execution, though he said he has forgiven Black. "God has a plan for everything," he told the paper. "He had a plan when he took my girls. He needed them more than I did, I guess." On July 22, a judgeorderedthat aheart device implanted in Blackneeded to be removed at a hospital the morning of his execution, a development that appeared to complicate matters asa Nashville hospital declined to participate. Butthe Tennessee Supreme Courtoverturnedthe judge's order, and the U.S. Supreme Court backed that up, clearing the way for Black to be executed despite the heart device. His attorneys argue that the device, designed to revive the heart, could lead to "a prolonged and torturous execution." "It's horrifying to think about this frail old man being shocked over and over as the device attempts to restore his heart's rhythm even as the State works to kill him," Henry said in a statement. The state is arguing that Black's heart device will not cause him pain. With their arguments over Byron's heart device at the end of the legal road, Black's attorneys are re-focusing their attention on his intellectual disabilities, and calling on Republican Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee to stop the execution and prevent "a grotesque spectacle." Citing Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and exposure to toxic lead, his attorneys said his mental impairments meant Black always had to live with and rely on family. Even now on death row, his attorneys said that other inmates "do his everyday tasks for him, including cleaning his cell, doing his laundry, and microwaving his food." "If ever a case called for the Governor to grant clemency or, at the very least, a reprieve, it is this one," Henry said in a statement. The director of Tennessee Conservatives Concerned About the Death Penalty said that she supports accountability for people who commit heinous crimes, but "the law is clear that we do not execute people with intellectual disability." "Governor Lee can insist on accountability while ensuring that the law is also followed. A situation such as this is exactly why governors have clemency power," Jasmine Woodson said in a statement. "Mr. Black has spent over three decades in prison for this crime and will never be released. As a conservative, I believe that he should remain behind bars, but he should not be executed." Lee's office has not responded to USA TODAY's requests for comment. In his statement to USA TODAY, Skrmetti pushed back at findings that he's intellectually disabled and said that "over the decades, courts have uniformly denied Black's eleven distinct attempts to overturn his murder convictions and death sentence." Earlier this year, Angela Clay's sister told The Tennessean that she and her family were frustrated with years of delays, court hearings, and uncertainty. "It's been decades and nothing has happened," she said. "He needs to pay for what he did." Angela Clay's mother, Marie Bell, told The Tennessean that she had been waiting far too long for justice. "I'm 88 years old and I just want to see it before I leave this Earth," she said. Contributing: Kelly Puente, The Tennessean Amanda Lee Myers is a senior crime reporter for USA TODAY. Follow her on X at @amandaleeusat. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Byron Black case: Disabilities and a heart device complicate execution

Tennessee to execute Byron Black amid heart device, intellectual disability concerns

Tennessee to execute Byron Black amid heart device, intellectual disability concerns As Angela Clay and hertwo young daughtersslept in their...
Country Star Zach Bryan Burns Flag 9 Months After Dramatic BreakupNew Foto - Country Star Zach Bryan Burns Flag 9 Months After Dramatic Breakup

Country Star Zach Bryan Burns Flag 9 Months After Dramatic Breakuporiginally appeared onParade. Nine months afterhis tumultuous breakupfrom Barstool Sports personalityBrianna "Chickenfry" LaPaglia,Zach Bryanis done talking. Instead, he's flag-burning. The 29-year-old "Something in the Orange Singer" took to his Instagram Story on Monday, August 9, to share a video of himself lighting a Barstool Sports flag — one emblazoned with the brand's famous "Saturdays Are for the Boys" tagline — on fire. A few seconds after it ignites, Bryan takes his golf club and hit half of the already-incinerated flag across his property. In the next video, he hops on board his tractor, apparently to go retrieve it. Bryan set the whole flag-burning process to the tune ofTyler Childers' "Bitin' List" — specifically the lines: "To put it plain, I just don't like you / not a thing about the way you is / And if there ever come a time I got rabies / you're high on my bitin' list." In addition to the telling lyrics, the country crooner's use of a Childers song could also be reference to the scathing diss track Barstool Sports'Dave PortnoyandJosh Richardsdropped about Bryan in the wake of his split from LaPaglia. In October 2024,Bryan and LaPaglia broke upafter months of dating, with the musician announcing their breakup in a lengthy post on social media. LaPaglia, for her part, soon went on her BarstoolBFFspodcast, whom she hosts withRichardsand, at the time, big bossPortnoy, who founded the sports brand. On the pod, LaPaglia accused Bryan of emotional abuse and further alleged that offered her $12 million to not discuss their split, which she turned down. Portnoy and Richards, for their part, came up with a wildly NSFW diss track about Bryan in defense of LaPaglia. Among the many lyrics aimed at the "Oklahoma Smokeshow" crooner, one line they rap in particular, is: "Your whole style'sMorgan Wallen, Tyler Childers, Copy Paste." Though October 2025 will mark a year since Bryan and LaPaglia's split, it looks like the drama is far from over — especially as Bryan's new fire-filled social media stunt comes on the heels of a jab he reportedly made at LaPaglia just last month. After a fan speculated that a new lyric on his song "River Washed Hair" could be about LaPaglia — "And I think I might pack a bag in the night / Find me some small town out West / Start over, find closure and just say 'I'm sorry' / To that sweet girl who tore off that dress," Bryan sings on the track — he took a shot at LaPaglia when shooting down the speculation. "Lmfao I said 'sweet,'" Bryan wrote in a comment that has since been deleted, perTaste of Country. "This is not about whatever she has going on hahahahahaah." Country Star Zach Bryan Burns Flag 9 Months After Dramatic Breakupfirst appeared on Parade on Aug 5, 2025 This story was originally reported byParadeon Aug 5, 2025, where it first appeared.

Country Star Zach Bryan Burns Flag 9 Months After Dramatic Breakup

Country Star Zach Bryan Burns Flag 9 Months After Dramatic Breakup Country Star Zach Bryan Burns Flag 9 Months After Dramatic Breakuporigina...
50 Years Ago Today, These Pioneering 'Queens of Rock and Noise' Formed the First All-Female Punk Rock BandNew Foto - 50 Years Ago Today, These Pioneering 'Queens of Rock and Noise' Formed the First All-Female Punk Rock Band

50 Years Ago Today, These Pioneering 'Queens of Rock and Noise' Formed the First All-Female Punk Rock Bandoriginally appeared onParade. Sometimes the most revolutionary ideas are born from the simplest observations. Fifty-three years ago today, on August 5, 1975, producerKim Fowleyhad a vision that would shatter every barrier in rock music: What if teenage girls could rock just as hard as the boys? That question led to the formation ofThe Runaways, the groundbreaking all-female band that proved women belonged on every stage in rock and roll. The band's origin story reads like rock mythology. Fowley discovered drummerSandy Westin the parking lot of the Rainbow Bar and Grill, where she convinced him of her talent on the spot. Meanwhile, guitaristJoan Jetthad auditioned for Fowley by playing ukulele to aSweetalbum before switching to guitar and becoming the band's driving force. What made The Runaways truly revolutionary wasn't just their gender – it was their age and attitude. These weren't seasoned musicians breaking into a male-dominated industry; they were teenagers creating their own space in rock history. Lead vocalistCherie Curriewas discovered at a teen nightclub, while bassistJackie Foxwas literally found in a parking lot by Fowley's associate. The band's impact was immediate and lasting. Their signature song "Cherry Bomb" became an anthem of teenage rebellion, while "Queens of Noise" – which inspired our headline – showcased their fierce energy and unapologetic attitude. They toured with established acts likeVan HalenandTalking Heads, proving they could hold their own with any rock band. Beyond their musical contributions, The Runaways opened doors that had never existed before. Their existence alone inspired countless young women to pick up instruments and start their own bands. Related: Legendary Rock Goddess, 66, Ageless Beauty and Timeless Performance Has Fans Stunned She's 'Still a Baddie' Though The Runaways disbanded in 1979 after releasing four studio albums, their influence rippled through generations. Joan Jett became a rock icon with herBlackhearts, whileLita Fordcarved out her own successful solo career. Their story proved that rock and roll belonged to anyone brave enough to claim it. Tragically, drummer Sandy West died in 2006 at just 47, but her legacy lives on in every female drummer who followed. The Runaways didn't just form a band – they created a blueprint for rebellion, showing that teenage girls could be just as loud, proud, and powerful as anyone else in rock music. 🎬SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox🎬 Today, as we celebrate their formation anniversary, The Runaways' message remains as relevant as ever: rock and roll has no gender, and music belongs to anyone bold enough to make some noise. 50 Years Ago Today, These Pioneering 'Queens of Rock and Noise' Formed the First All-Female Punk Rock Bandfirst appeared on Parade on Aug 5, 2025 This story was originally reported byParadeon Aug 5, 2025, where it first appeared.

50 Years Ago Today, These Pioneering ‘Queens of Rock and Noise’ Formed the First All-Female Punk Rock Band

50 Years Ago Today, These Pioneering 'Queens of Rock and Noise' Formed the First All-Female Punk Rock Band 50 Years Ago Today, These...
Is an AI backlash brewing? What 'clanker' says about growing frustrations with emerging techNew Foto - Is an AI backlash brewing? What 'clanker' says about growing frustrations with emerging tech

It's a slur for the AI age. "Clanker," a word that traces back toa Star Wars video game, has emerged in recent weeks as the internet's favorite epithet for any kind of technology looking to replace humans. On TikTok, people harass robotsin storesandon sidewalkswith it. Search interest for the termhas spiked. On X, Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., used the term last week to tout a new piece of legislation. "Sick of yelling "REPRESENTATIVE" into the phone 10 times just to talk to a human being?," heposted on X. "My new bill makes sure you don't have to talk to a clanker if you don't want to." In one video, which hasmore than 6 million views on TikTok, a small, four-wheeled delivery robot gets berated with the word. "It makes me sick just seeing a..." Nic, a 19-year-old student and aspiring content creator in Miami Beach who posted the video, says as it approached, adding: "Clanker!" A slur is generally defined as a word or phrase meant to denigrate a person based on their membership to a particular group such as a race, gender or religion — one that goes beyond rudeness intoovert bigotry. They are almost always directed at people. "Clanker" appears to have peeked into the internet's lexicon starting in early June, with Google Trends data showing a sudden uptick in search interest. An entry onKnowYourMeme.com, a website dedicated to documenting the varied weirdness of the internet, traced the term back to the 2010s, when Star Wars communities adopted it from its use in various Star Wars shows to refer to battle robots. Other pieces of science fiction also predicted the rise of slurs for machines, most notably "Blade Runner," with "skinjob" to refer to highly advanced, humanlike robots. But there's a catch. By using a slur in a way that would typically apply to a human, people are also elevating the technology, offering some sense that people both want to put down the machines and recognize their ascension in society. Adam Aleksic, a linguist who is also a content creatorfocused on how the internet is shaping language, said he first noticed the emergence of "clanker" a couple of weeks ago. Its use mirrored classic slurs related to racial tropes and appeared to emerge out of a growing "cultural need" related to growing unease with where advanced technology is heading. In one video — somewhat ironicallyappearing to have been created by AI— a man berates his daughter during a family dinner for dating "a goddamned clanker," before his wife steps in and apologizes to the robot. "What we're doing is we're anthropomorphizing and personifying and simplifying the concept of an AI, reducing it into an analogy of a human and kind of playing into the same tropes," Aleksic said. "Naturally, when we trend in that direction, it does play into those tropes of how people have treated marginalized communities before." The use of "clanker" is rising as people are more often encountering AI and robots in their daily lives, something that is only expected to continue in the coming years. The steady expansion of Waymo's driverless cars across U.S. cities has also come with some human-inflictedbumps and bruises for the vehicles along the way. Food delivery bots arean increasingly common sight on sidewalks. In the virtual world, cybersecurity firmscontinue to warnabout the proliferation of bots on the web that comprise a growing share of all web traffic — includingas many as one in five social media accounts. The anti-machine backlash has long been simmering but is now seemingly breaking to the surface. A global report by Gartner research groupfoundthat 64% of customers would prefer that companies didn't use AI for customer service — with another 53% stating they would consider switching to a competitor if they found out a company was doing so. People are becomingmore worried about AI taking their jobs, even though evidence of actual AI-related job losses isrelatively scant. "Clanker" is also not the first pejorative term for something related to AI to have spread across the internet. "Slop" as a catchall term for AI-generated content that is of low quality or obviously created by AI — such as "shrimp Jesus" — entered internet parlance last year and has since become widely used. Other anti-AI terms that have emerged include "tin skin" and "toaster," a term that traces back to the science fiction show Battlestar Galactica. And there's even some pushback — joking and serious — about whether such slurs should be used. In a Reddit community for Black women,a post about "clanker"offered some sense of the tension: "And I know it's probably a joke in all from social media, but I can't help but feel like it's incredibly tasteless." Others have noted that some of the enthusiastic embrace of "clanker" feels more about being able to throw around a slur rather than any deeper issue with technology. Nic, whose TikTok video helped spark the "clanker" phenomenon, said he sees both why people have taken to the phrase as well as why some find it problematic. Nic, who asked to withhold his last name out of privacy concerns, said he did sense some people were using the word as a stand-in for a racial epithet. Still, Nic, who is Black, said he saw the term more broadly as a lighthearted way to express a growing anxiety with where technology is headed, particularly as it pertains to the future of employment. "I see it as being a push back against AI," he said. "A lot of lives are being changed because of robots ... and me personally I see it as a stupid way of fighting, but there's a little truth to it, as well."

Is an AI backlash brewing? What 'clanker' says about growing frustrations with emerging tech

Is an AI backlash brewing? What 'clanker' says about growing frustrations with emerging tech It's a slur for the AI age. "C...

 

ALPHA MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com