Why a '70s Singer Missed Out on Recording What Became the Beatles' Final Hit SongNew Foto - Why a '70s Singer Missed Out on Recording What Became the Beatles' Final Hit Song

Why a '70s Singer Missed Out on Recording What Became the Beatles' Final Hit Songoriginally appeared onParade. Can you imagine anyone butPaul McCartneysinging "The Long and Winding Road"? Released in May 1970, a month afterThe Beatlesbroke up, the song stood as a makeshift eulogy for the band. Fans found solace and sympathy in McCartney's voice as he sang, "The wild and windy night that the rain washed away / Has left a pool of tears, crying for the day  / Why leave me standing here? / Let me know the way." Released as a single in the U.S. (and oddly, not in the U.K.), "The Long and Winding Road" went to the top of the charts. As of today, it's the band's last No. 1 song on the U.S.BillboardHot 100—but, as Beatles lore goes, it was meant for someone else:Tom Jones. Recently,Tim David Kelly, aka Tim From Kicking Harold, highlighted how McCartney and Tom Jones "were having a great time" while out on the town. After a few drinks, Jones asked McCartney to write him a song. "Paul, who very much enjoyed doing this type of thing, told his friend he'd be happy to write a song for him." McCartney soon had the song ready and sent it over to Jones. But McCartney included a catch. "The condition was that I could do it, but it had to be my next single," Jones toldWales Onlinein 2013. "Paul wanted it out straight away. At that time, I had a song called 'Without Love' that I was going to be releasing." Jones asked his record label, which was "gearing up" towards the release of "Without Love," if he could "stop everything" so he could record this new song. "They said it would take a lot of time, and it was impractical, so I ended up not doing it," said Jones. "I was kicking myself," he said. "I knew it was a strong song and of course it subsequently appeared on[Let It Be]." "The Long and Winding Road" was a source of contention within the Beatles. McCartney—who already resented the band's manager, Allen Klein—was furious that Klein, apparently without consulting anyone in the band, had producer Phil Spector record the orchestral and choral overdubs to the song. McCartneywrote a letterto Klein and Spector, demanding that "in the future, no one will be allowed to add to or subtract from a recording of one of my songs without my permission." He also demanded changes to the version, ending his note with "Don't ever do it again." Related: A Beatle's Haunting Song Sets the Mood at Start of New Horror Movie 'Weapons' Why a '70s Singer Missed Out on Recording What Became the Beatles' Final Hit Songfirst appeared on Parade on Aug 11, 2025 This story was originally reported byParadeon Aug 11, 2025, where it first appeared.

Why a ’70s Singer Missed Out on Recording What Became the Beatles' Final Hit Song

Why a '70s Singer Missed Out on Recording What Became the Beatles' Final Hit Song Why a '70s Singer Missed Out on Recording What...
We Spent Three Seasons Hate-Watching 'And Just Like That….' Why Are We So Sad to See It Go?New Foto - We Spent Three Seasons Hate-Watching 'And Just Like That….' Why Are We So Sad to See It Go?

"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." The week afterMichael Patrick King announcedthatAnd Just Like That... would be abruptly ending after its third season,Carrie Bradshawfound herself revisiting her old Upper East Side studio apartment in what had suddenly become the series' penultimate episode. As she surveyed with barely restrained horror the changes her new tenants had made, it was written all over her face that she couldn't help but wonder…what the hell had happened? Viewers have been asking the same thing sinceAJLTfirst premiered in 2021. Three season later, it's gained a reputation as TV's preeminent hate watch. Yet its fans and its haters (often the same people) were struck with a new question after King's announcement: Why are we so sad to say goodbye to a series that we've spent years collectively razzing on? The answer probably lies in the almost 30-year relationship we've had with its predecessor. When it first aired in 1998, as its title promised,Sex and the Citywas first and foremost a snapshot of the sexual zeitgeist from the frontlines of the world's most metropolitan dating scene. But while it was hot in the literal sense, it was also hot in the abstract—invigorating in the ways its characters talked and dressed and drank cosmos with dinner. The writers used the characters as vessels to cheekily debate changing romantic mores, but audiences were captivated just as much with them as with the show's risqué preoccupations. Yes, the women were all straight and lily white and upwardly mobile, and the clothes they wore and the hotspots they frequented only available through the kind of cash or social capital that most people didn't have. Yes, it had its blind spots then and hot takes that don't stand up to scrutiny today. Despite that—or perhapsbecauseof it, since the show cultivated an air of exclusivity but invited viewers to sit down with the gals and join the conversation—the show captured a wide-reaching collective imagination. It was somehow both aspirational and relatable. Anyone could ask themselves and their friends: Are you a Carrie or a Samantha or a Charlotte or a Miranda? (And for a while, it felt like everyone did.) By the end of the series, viewers knew these characters so intimately that they could recast them with the women (and men) in their own lives. As topical as the show was, its relevance has also been remarkably resilient. At 14, you could watch it on your friend's satellite dish when their parents weren't home and imagine yourselves moving to the big city and walking in Carrie's Manolos. At 24, you could buy a DVD box set of the full series and, high on the newfound freedoms of adulthood, declare yourself a Samantha. At 34, you could binge watch the show online after a long day's work in your well-worn "We Should All Be Mirandas" shirt. If you were a contemporary of the actors when the show debuted, you were able to grow and age with them; maybe now you have Gen-Z kids who have rediscovered the show as so many young people have—with a gleefully savage critical eye that makes you feel like a positively Pollyanna-ish Charlotte. So whenAJLTpromised to check in on the ladies almost 18 years after the end ofSATCand a decade after its second movie (the less of which is said, the better), it was to both great fanfare and trepidation. There was the drama surroundingKim Cattrall's decision not to reprise her role as Samantha, the speculation aroundMr. Big's on-screen death, and of Chris Noth'salleged real-life misconduct. But the most pressing question looming over the show was how it, and its characters, would stack up to our expectations all these years later. After all, for two decades, we'd been checking back in with the ladies on our ownSATCrewatches. Our opinions of their escapades have evolved with time and with our own experiences and circumstances. We related to them deeply back then, and they've grown and changed in our imagination as we ourselves have grown and changed.AJLTfelt like an invitation to a reunion brunch with old friends—with all its attendant anxieties. What if they're different? What if we have less in common? What if we don't recognize them at all? Still, I'll admit that after I first watchedAJLT's two-part series premiere, I felt a rush of excitement. There was a lot to quibble with, yes. The explanation for Samantha's absence rang false. And I'd rather listen to those Saatva Mattress podcast commercials on a loop than listen to Carrie's actual podcast. There was lots to nitpick, but nitpicking was part of the fun of watchingSATCtoo. What excited me was that we'd reunited with the ladies and they were indeed different—but I still recognized them. And with that, I imagined all the new frontiers of the zeitgeist they could conquer. I imagined Carrie back in the dating pool at an entirely different stage of her life, looking for love or sex or both or neither in the shadow of grief. She was once again single, but nothing about it was fabulous this time. I imagined Miranda going back to school and learning that she's no longer on the cutting edge of feminism, her queer awakening bringing her into new spaces that only reinforce that dissonance in starkly personal terms. I imagined Charlotte looking around at the life she's always wanted for herself and discovering that she's still left wanting. I even imagined Samantha, in her absence, as a conduit to exploring relationships of a different kind, of how difficult old friendships can be to maintain or new friendships to cultivate. I imagined that my friends had gone away and lived full, complicated lives and returned to once again debate the topics of a new era with the same old verve. None of that happened, or at least not in any satisfying or sustained way. These threads seemed to be there from the start, but the series seemed to have no interest in pulling at them. I'm not the only one who was left disappointed. Over three seasons,AJLThas baffled many longtimeSATCfans. Carrie, Charlotte, and Miranda made choices that felt out of character. Some storylines fell flat or went nowhere or, in at least one instance, doubled back on itself. (R.I.P. Mr. Todd. And youtoo, Mr. Todd.) Characters both new (Che) and old (Aidan) so irked audiences that we practically ran them out of town. A cast of beautiful and talented of actors were introduced to play Seema, Lisa, and Nya, only to be sidelined to varying degrees. And even as they were meant to bring more diversity—in skin tone, but also in relationship or family status, romantic and professional challenges, or just vibes—they ended up only reinforcing an uncomfortable truth about the ensemble: They are all veryrich. Some, like Miranda and Nya, might be less so than Lisa, whose kitchen view of Central Park from 30,000 feet feels like a better fit forSuccession,but they are all undeniably, almost flagrantly rich. Their lifestyles are no longer aspirational fantasies, but oppressive reminders of very real class disparity. In the same way Carrie seems to long for her more modest old apartment, we too long for her to return and pretend she never had enough money to putz around in a cavernous 1840s Greek Revival mansion in Manhattan. Yet somehow, despite all this wealth, their outlandish silhouettes rarely darken the doorsteps of the kind of see-and-be-seen establishments the original series was known for catapulting onto every tourist's bucket list. Instead, they all hang out at Anthony's "Hot Fellas Bakery," and that place is essentially a Le Pain Quotidien but with a lot more swinging salami. WhereSATCperfected a magical mix of aspirational and relatable,AJLT's recipe is all out of whack. Yet for all our critiques, the most common refrain about the show has become: "I hate this show…and I need 19 more seasons." You could chalk it up toschadenfreudeor morbid fascination. Or you could chalk it up to our familiarity with these characters—and, ultimately, our affection for them too. Dumping our conflicted feelings aboutAJLTinto group chats and TikTok feeds feels like gossiping to our (real) friends about our other (fictional) friends. We may enjoy lovingly roasting them, but damned if we won't pick up the phone if they call. In short, we still just want to hang out with them—and getting a little fodder for the group chat later is just a bonus. Cast members have taken the reactions in stride, though they've sometimes wondered aloud to reporters,Who would better know these characters than the actors and writers who have breathed life into them for decades?And they have a point. You can't argue that these characters have been in the hands of anyone but their lifelong stewards for the duration ofAJLT. Nor could you argue that the actors don't deeply love their characters. They have made them as real as you could ever make a role written on a page. And they still play them with the same charm, the same excitement, and the same lived-in confidence as ever. (In some cases, the actors even leveled up. Say what you will about Charlotte's shenanigans, but Kristin Davis is doing some of the best physical comedy in the game.) Sarah Jessica Parker, in particular, has never turned away from Carrie's inherent messiness. Even in her farewell poem to the character, posted on her Instagram the same day King announced the end of the series, she wrote, "I know others have loved her just as I have. Been frustrated, condemned and rooted for her." And we were still rooting for her. Part of reuniting with old friends is accepting the ways they've changed, perhaps excusing the ways they've disappointed you, and forging a new relationship to match who you both are now. So why are we so sad to seeAJLTend 16 seasons short of our facetious but also maybe-kinda-sorta-true pleas for more? I think I'm sad to see the show go before witnessing what it ultimately could have been. Maybe in one more season,AJLTwould have become something closer to what we wanted. Or maybe one more season would have given us time to settle back into our friendship not with the ladies we watched and rewatched inSATC, but with the ladies as they are now. Or, you know, maybe not. We'll never know. But I couldn't help but wonder…. You Might Also Like 4 Investment-Worthy Skincare Finds From Sephora The 17 Best Retinol Creams Worth Adding to Your Skin Care Routine

We Spent Three Seasons Hate-Watching 'And Just Like That….' Why Are We So Sad to See It Go?

We Spent Three Seasons Hate-Watching 'And Just Like That….' Why Are We So Sad to See It Go? "Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may ear...
After Outrage, Woman Explains Why She Donated Her Daughter's Pony To Zoo To Be Eaten By LionsNew Foto - After Outrage, Woman Explains Why She Donated Her Daughter's Pony To Zoo To Be Eaten By Lions

A request from azooinDenmarkfordonated animalsto feed to their lions sparked majorbacklashfrom animal rights groups and netizens, calling it disturbing. But for people who've used the service, which zoos have been offering for years, it's the mosthumane, and often the most affordable, way to dispose of large animals. In one case, a 13-year-old girl chose to donate her sick horse to the zoo because she felt it adhered to a "circle of life" philosophy. Image credits:Wikipedia Image credits:aalborgzoo / Instagram Last month, theAalborg Zooin northern Denmark posted to its Facebook account an appeal for animals that could be euthanized to feed to predatory creatures, like lions and tigers. The post read in part: "We gratefully accept animal donations from both private individuals and businesses for euthanisation and slaughter at Aalborg Zoo." Image credits:aalborgzoo.dk The post explained that predators need whole prey, "including fur, bones and organs", because it contributes to the animals' well-being. The ad said that while they do accept guinea pigs, rabbits, and chickens, they do not accept cats and dogs. Image credits:Pernille Sohl It didn't take long for the post to ricochet around the internet, garnering comments that ranged from funny to accusatory. Some people jokingly asked if they could donate an annoying family member, while others accused thezooof being callous. Image credits:Pernille Sohl The number of hostile responses on theAalborg Zoo's website from all over the world forced them to close their comments section. But in the days since the initial post and internet backlash, stories have been coming out about people who've proudly used thezoo's service, which it has been offering for years. Image credits:Pernille Sohl According to astoryinThe Times,a woman named Pernille Sohl decided to use the service a few years ago to put down a 22-year-old German riding pony with painful eczema and open wounds. The article says Sohl, who runs a farm where children with mental health issues can interact with horses, chose the zoo instead of a vet mainly because her 13-year-old daughter Angelina preferred it. Image credits:Pernille Sohl "I gave Angelina the various options and she chose the one with the zoo, because it made the most sense," Sohl toldThe Times. "She had previously watched one of my horses being taken away by the vet to be euthanised, and it was a bad experience for her. She said that this time she wanted to follow the food chain," Sohl said in the article, continuing that her daughter wanted the horse "to benefit other animals." Image credits:Pernille Sohl The act of feeding whole animals to predators is actually something that benefits their health, members of thezoosaid in a statement on their website. "Predators need whole prey — including fur, bones and organs — as it contributes to both enrichment, nutrition and wellbeing," the message said. Image credits:Aalborg Zoo / Facebook "By allowing necessary k*lls to become part of the food chain, we avoid waste and instead create a meaningful farewell where the animal can benefit both the predators in the garden and nature." According to the article, the "AalborgZoo, which attracts almost half a million people a year, has been receiving such donations since it was founded in 1935." Image credits:Aalborg Zoo / Facebook It's not the only zoo to face a backlash for feeding some of its animals to other animals in its care. The Nuremberg Zoo in Germany received pushback after announcing it had culled 12 Guinea baboons due to overcrowding in their enclosure. Image credits:Bonnie Kittle / Unsplash According to an article fromDeutsche Welle, "Half were then fed to lions, tigers, maned wolves and marbled polecats, and the skeletons of others will be put on display in a museum." The article said the animals' heads, feet, and hands were removed "out of respect for visitors" who would see the carnivores feeding, quoting Jörg Beckmann, the zoo's deputy director. Image credits:Zachariah Smith / Unsplash After getting pushback from animal rights groups, thezooacknowledged that people might be "confused, affected, or angry" about the cull, but explained that "whole-animal feeding provides crucial dental health benefits for carnivores." Thezooadded that, unlike many house pets, which get surgery to remove the plaque buildup from their teeth because of processed food: "Unlike many pets, our animals don't need tartar removal under general anesthesia." Image credits:Google Maps

After Outrage, Woman Explains Why She Donated Her Daughter’s Pony To Zoo To Be Eaten By Lions

After Outrage, Woman Explains Why She Donated Her Daughter's Pony To Zoo To Be Eaten By Lions A request from azooinDenmarkfordonated ani...
Arkansas authorities say additional employees disciplined at prison where ex-police chief escapedNew Foto - Arkansas authorities say additional employees disciplined at prison where ex-police chief escaped

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Additional employees at an Arkansas prison have been disciplined for not following procedures after a convicted murderer known as the"Devil in the Ozarks"escaped earlier this summer, a state prison system official told lawmakers Monday. Arkansas Division of Correction Director Dexter Payne said several employees at the Calico Rock prison had been suspended and another demoted for allowing inmates to use an outdoor kitchen dock unsupervised. Payne did not specify how many employees had been suspended, and did not give their names. "Those employees have also been disciplined for their actions," Payne told members of the Legislative Council's Charitable, Penal and Correctional Institutions Subcommittee. The dock had played a key role in the May 25 escape of Grant Hardin from the prison, formally known as the North Central Unit. Two employees at the facility, including one who allowed Hardin on the dock unsupervised, hadpreviously been firedin the weeks following his escape. Hardin held a job in the prison's kitchen. Hardin was captured 1.5 miles (2.4 kilometers) northwest of the Calico Rock prison on June 6. Authorities said he escaped by donning an outfit designed to look like a law enforcement uniform. The outfit was crafted from an inmate uniform and a kitchen apron dyed black using a marker, while a soup can lid and a Bible cover were fashioned to look like a badge, corrections officials told the panel last month. The other employee who had been fired earlier had opened the gate that Hardin walked through without confirming his identity. Payne said corrections officials have nearly completed the report on their critical incident review of the escape. A report on the State Police's investigation into the escape has also been sent to the governor's office, the Department of Public Services said. Payne said the review also found that Hardin had been incorrectly classified as eligible to be housed at Calico Rock, which is primarily a medium-security facility. Hardin had been held at the Calico Rock prison since 2017. Payne said he didn't know why Hardin wasn't correctly classified. "Without an override, he should not have been there," Payne said. After he was captured, Hardin was taken to a maximum-security prison. Hardin has pleaded not guilty to an escape charge and is set to go on trial in November. Hardin, a former police chief in the small town of Gateway, near the Arkansas-Missouri border,is serving lengthy sentences for murder and rape. He was the subject of the TV documentary "Devil in the Ozarks." One change that has been made at the facility since the escape is an increase in searches outside the facility, Payne said. Officials have previously said Hardin fashioned a ladder out of wooden pallets that he kept on the dock. "The back dock area was not searched enough, or they would have found he was hiding items on that back dock," he said. Payne faced further pushback from lawmakers who said the escape points to a more systemic issue than two employees not doing their job. "Yeah, people didn't do their job, but also there should be checks and balances to ensure that people do their job," Republican Sen. Ben Gilmore said. "Where are those checks and balances?"

Arkansas authorities say additional employees disciplined at prison where ex-police chief escaped

Arkansas authorities say additional employees disciplined at prison where ex-police chief escaped LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Additional employ...
Business spat between Daryl Hall and John Oates has been resolved in arbitration, attorneys sayNew Foto - Business spat between Daryl Hall and John Oates has been resolved in arbitration, attorneys say

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Daryl Hall and John Oates have resolved their dispute over aHall & Oatesbusiness partnership through arbitration, reaching a private ending after details of their rift went public in court documents filed in a 2023 lawsuit byHall against Oates, according to a court filing Monday. In Monday's status report, attorneys for Hall noted the case received a final judgment in arbitration and they filed a proposed order for the judge, Nashville Chancellor Russell Perkins, to dismiss the case. In mid-July, Perkins ordered Hall's attorneys to offer an update in the case, which had last seen a public filing in December 2023. It's unclear when the arbitration process was finalized. And details were not revealed about the arbitration outcome between the duo who made music together for more than a half century, including hits in the 1970s and '80s such as "Maneater," "Rich Girl" "Kiss on My List" and "I Can't Go for That (No Can Do)." Robb Harvey, an attorney for Hall, declined to comment. Representatives for Oates did not immediately respond to The Associated Press' request for comment. In 2023 filings in the case, Hallaccused Oates of blindsiding and betraying him, saying their relationship and his trust in Oates have deteriorated. Oates replied that he was "deeply hurt" that Hall was making "inflammatory, outlandish, and inaccurate statements" about him. The judge hadpaused the sale of Oates' stakein Whole Oats Enterprises LLP to Primary Wave IP Investment Management LLC. Whole Oats includes valuable Hall & Oates materials such as trademarks, personal name and likeness rights, record royalty income and website and social media assets, a court declaration says. The dispute went public in November 2023, when Hall filed the lawsuit asking the judge to stop the sale by Oates so private arbitration could begin. Hall gave a scathing account of their relationship in early November 2023 during arbitration, and it was made public later in the month in the lawsuit. It alleges that Oates and his team engaged in the "ultimate partnership betrayal" by pushing to sell his share while telling Hall's associates that he wanted to maintain his ownership. In his own declaration, Oates expressed disappointment with his longtime partner's words, saying Hall's accusations that Oates went behind his back and breached their agreement aren't true. Oates declined to go into specifics, saying he's obligated to keep details private, even if Hall didn't. Last year,Oates told The Associated Pressthat he's had "no communication" with Hall and declined to discuss the legal proceedings. He did not see a Hall & Oates reunion in his future. "I personally don't see it happening. It's not in my plans at all. You can askDaryl Hallwhat he thinks. But for me personally, no," he says. The Times asked Hall in Februaryif the ship had sailed on mending the pair's relationship. "That ship has gone to the bottom of the ocean," Hall told the news outlet. "I've had a lot of surprises in my life, disappointments, betrayals, so I'm kind of used to it." ___ Maria Sherman in New York contributed to this report.

Business spat between Daryl Hall and John Oates has been resolved in arbitration, attorneys say

Business spat between Daryl Hall and John Oates has been resolved in arbitration, attorneys say NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Daryl Hall and John ...

 

ALPHA MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com