When Queen Elizabeth II phoned Trump and other scoops from a new book

Queen Elizabeth II was dismayed by the flattening of her flowers in the garden at Buckingham Palace whenPresident Trumparrived in 2019 aboard Marine One.

USA TODAY

But his state visit there was a highlight of Trump's first term and valuable for Great Britain, building a relationship with the controversial U.S. president. Weeks later, the Queen tapped that relationship to smooth a diplomatic contretemps.

Here are five takeaways from USA TODAY's excerpt ofa new book, "The Queen and Her Presidents: The Hidden Hand That Shaped History,"by Susan Page. Published by Harper, it explores the Queen's relationship with a string of U.S. presidents, from the time she was a nervous young princess visiting President Harry Truman to the final state dinner of her seven-decade reign, in honor of Trump.

1. 'It ruined the garden'

The president and first ladyMelania Trumparrived at Buckingham Palace on June 3, 2019, aboard Marine One.

From the palace steps, Her Majesty watched with horror as the whirlwind of the helicopter's blades flattened her flowers and left divots on the lawn. "She was furious about that," a senior palace aide said.

When Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison arrived later, she was still steaming. "Come and look at my lawn," she told him. "It's ruined."

2. Quizzing the Queen

In their lively conversation at the gilded state dinner that night, Trump tried, unsuccessfully, to convince the Queen to dish about the 14 other U.S. presidents she had met, 12 of them while in office.

"I said, 'So could I ask you who was your favorite president?'" he said.

She replied, "Why? They were all so good."

He was dazzled by her skill at charming deflection. "I couldn't get her to say a bad thing about anybody."

3. What about Harry and Meghan?

Her discretion included Prince Harry and Meghan, her wayward grandson and his controversial bride. Seven months later, they announced they would step back from their duties as senior royals.

No one could have possibly missed the soap-opera saga that surrounded them, but Trump was almost certainly one of very few guests who raised the topic directly with Elizabeth.

“The Queen and Her Presidents” by veteran journalist Susan Page, Washington bureau chief for USA TODAY, will explore the relationship between Britain's Queen Elizabeth II and American presidents. The book will be released on April 14, 2026.

"I asked her about it constantly," Trump said. "I'd say, 'Come on, tell me (what you really think).'"

She replied, "No, no. It's very nice."

Trump was unpersuaded. "I really think it hurt her," he said. "I just don't think they treated her with the respect that she should have, frankly."

4. A crucial royal phone call

Three weeks after Trump's triumphant state visit to London, there was trouble.

Advertisement

Devastating assessments of the president, written two years earlier by the British ambassador to the U.S., Kim Darroch, were leaked to Britain'sMail on Sunday. Trump "radiates insecurity," Darroch wrote, and was leading a dysfunctional administration.

Trump was livid. Darroch was forced to resign.

Then the Queen called, a conversation not previously reported. "She couldn't believe it; she thought he was terrible," Trump said. "She apologized," he said, then qualified that. "It wasn't an apology," exactly.

"She didn't call (Darroch) a fool, but she basically indicated that he was a stupid person," Trump said.

Whatever she said, it was enough. The crisis passed.

5. Trump has a theory

The Queen refused to answer the question, but afterwards Trump said he was told by others that she did have a favorite president.

It was him.

"We just got along," Trump said. His ambassador, Woody Johnson, agreed. "The president has a very keen sense of things like that," Johnson said.

Several senior officials in the palace and the British government responded with startled laughter to the idea that her relationship with Trump could have matched the affection she felt for some of his predecessors. Dwight Eisenhower had been a wartime hero and Ronald Reagan a friend who bonded over horses and Hollywood. Her fondness for Barack Obama had struck officials on both sides of the Atlantic.

Some former presidents and first ladies were skeptical, too.

"That's hysterical," Jill Biden said asJoe Bidenshook his head. "Oh, that fits his character, for sure."

Hillary Clinton responded, "Why am I not surprised by that?" She added, "I don't think there is any evidence to believe that could possibly be true."

Bill Clinton recalled a conversation he had with Obama and Biden in 2024. "We were all joking at Ethel Kennedy's funeral about how she tried to make every Democratic president feel like he was her favorite, and she was shrewd about that, Ethel was. And Queen Elizabeth was no dummy. She knew what she was doing ..."

He would be "shocked" if Elizabeth had ever identified a favorite, Bill Clinton said. "I have no idea what she really thought of any of us. I just know ... what I thought of her, and I thought she was really special."

Susan Page is the Washington Bureau chief of USA TODAY and the best-selling author of biographies of Barbara Bush, Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Walters.

Pre-order "The Queen and Her Presidents" here.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:When Queen Elizabeth phoned Trump and other takeaways from a new book

When Queen Elizabeth II phoned Trump and other scoops from a new book

Queen Elizabeth II was dismayed by the flattening of her flowers in the garden at Buckingham Palace whenPresident Trumpar...
Trump adored Elizabeth. Was he the Queen's favorite president?

Drawn from "The Queen and Her Presidents: The Hidden Hand That Shaped History," by Susan Page, to be published April 14, 2026, by Harper.

USA TODAY

Queen Elizabeth II was not smiling as she watched the whirlwind of Marine One's blades flatten her flowers. "It ruined the garden," a senior palace aide said. "She was furious about that." The annoyance lingered to the point that she later complained about it to Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison. "Come and look at my lawn," she told him. "It's ruined."

But on June 3, 2019, nothing could spoil this moment for PresidentDonald Trump.

He had wanted a state visit to England, and being toasted by Her Majesty, since his inauguration. Whatever else his presidency might bring, he saw it as a highlight, a personal milestone with a meaning beyond politics. He was "slightly awestruck" when he talked about her, National Security Council staffer Fiona Hill said, and his voice and face would soften. "A meeting with the Queen of England was the ultimate sign that he, Trump, had made it in life." The monarch's personal charm and storied history were just one side of the appeal. The other was the mirror she would provide, reflecting the stature he had long sought.

Finally, he was arriving. But it had taken two years of effort to overcome British alarm about this unexpected new American president. When they arrived at Buckingham Palace, rather than driving from Winfield House, the U.S. ambassador's residence, the Trump White House wanted the president's helicopter to land on the grounds, offering more dramatic visuals.

Despite the flowers.

At the white-tie banquet that night were eight Trumps and 16 members of the royal family, spanning three generations − 170 guests in all.

The evening's conversation between Elizabeth and Trump was lively. "I was in the groove," he told Woody Johnson the next morning. The U.S. ambassador, who had known Trump for decades, offered: "My own judgment is, after the first four years and maybe to this day, of all the people that he met, the Queen had the most special relationship, the most special impact on him."

Scoops from the new book:When Queen Elizabeth II phoned Trump

'Did you like Ronald Reagan the best?'

Later, the president gave me a rundown on their conversation that night.

"I said, 'So could I ask you who was your favorite president?'"

The Queen replied, "Why? They were all so good."

"I know, but did you like Ronald Reagan the best?" Trump asked.

President Donald Trump and Britain's Queen Elizabeth raise their glasses to make a toast at the State Banquet at Buckingham Palace in London, Britain, June 3, 2019.

"Oh, yes, I liked him very much, but they were all good."

"Oh, well, what about Nixon?"

"Oh, he was excellent."

"So what do you mean you liked them all?" Trump pressed.

"I liked them all. I can't say anything bad about any of them. They were great."

"OK, let's go to prime ministers. Who was your favorite prime minister? It had to be Churchill, right?"

"No, no, no. He was wonderful, Winston. But they were all so good. They worked so hard. They were very different, but they worked so hard. They were all so good."

Trump was dazzled by her skill at charming deflection. "I said to myself, how genius is this?" he said. "I couldn't get her to say a bad thing about anybody. She was amazing, actually. And not for any reason other than I don't think she wanted to create controversy. It was unnecessary."

For Trump, she prompted a rare moment of self-reflection.

"I hate to say this because it's very disparaging to myself. She was sort of the opposite of me. She didn't mix it up." That discipline was at the foundation of her reputation and her role. "She was there for so many decades, and she literally never made a mistake," he said. "If you think about it. I mean, everyone was making mistakes around her, but she never made a mistake."

Trump said Harry and Meghan hurt the Queen

She parried his queries about Prince Harry and Meghan, her wayward grandson and his problematic bride. Seven months after Trump's state dinner, they announced they would step back from their duties as senior royals and in short order moved to Montecito, California.

Despite the headlines that Harry and Meghan were generating − no one could possibly have missed them − Trump was almost certainly one of very few guests who raised that most personal of topics directly with the Queen. She responded with the most diplomatic of stonewalls. "I asked her about it constantly," Trump told me. "I'd say, 'Come on, tell me.' 'No, no. It's very nice.' Everybody was nice. She liked everybody."

But he was prepared to take offense on her behalf.

"I couldn't get her to say it. I'm good at that, too," he said. She demurred. "She would always say, 'No, no, would be lovely, lovely.' But it wasn't lovely, and I think it hurt her. I really think it hurt her. It was tremendous dissension, and I just don't think they treated her with the respect that she should have, frankly."

He said he wouldn't have reacted to a similar affront in the same forgiving way.

"I actually told her I couldn't do what she does, because she was very cool on the subject. She would talk about it but never said anything bad about either of them, and I think she loved Harry, really loved Harry. But Harry's been, I feel, led astray. I really do. I think he's been terribly led astray. It's just so disrespectful the way that happened, and she didn't deserve that. This is a woman that everybody respected so much. I think she was stunned by what was happening, actually. She couldn't believe it in real time."

The grand banquet at Buckingham ended with a dozen bagpipers circling the room three times as they performed, a tradition Queen Victoria had begun.

"They gave me a tremendously, the five-star dinner, and it was really incredible," Trump told me. "I sat with her for hours, and Camilla was on my right and she was on my left, and we talked for a long time."

The Queen and he had "a great chemistry together," he said with satisfaction. "There was a great honor for me to know her, then ultimately get to know her well."

After the dinner, trouble

There had been a small discordant note at the state dinner.

Stephanie Grisham, thenMelania Trump's press secretary, was seated next to Kim Darroch, the British ambassador. "We bonded over wine and American football," the first lady's spokesperson recalled, "but I did get an odd vibe from him when he asked, 'How do you do it? Work for a man like your president?'"

Advertisement

Two days later, Darroch was among the dignitaries gathered at Southampton to say goodbye to Trump as he boarded Air Force One. "This was a wonderful visit, and U.K.-U.S. relations are now in the best state ever," Trump told him, shaking his hand. A jubilant Darroch sent a diplomatic cable with his "impressions and implications" of the state visit − a trip that the British had delayed as long as they could.

"With this unorthodox President, there were genuine risks," he wrote, but "the gamble paid handsomely." The highlight for Trump had been the "extensive personal engagement" with the Queen at their private lunch, at the glittering dinner, at D-Day commemorations in Portsmouth.

Trump's team had been "dazzled," he said. "We are basking in a big success, with doors open everywhere in Washington."

Three weeks later, the door would be opened for Darroch's forced exit. The problem: Trump found out what the ambassador really thought about him in leaked cables from 2017 that said the president "radiates insecurity" and led a dysfunctional administration.

Darroch didn't intend his candid views to be read by the White House or by anyone beyond an elite circle in London with the security clearance to see documents stamped "Official Sensitive."

U.S. President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump attend a welcome ceremony with Britain's Queen Elizabeth, Prince Charles and Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, at Buckingham Palace, in London, Britain, June 3, 2019. REUTERS/Simon Dawson

But on July 7, 2019, his cables were leaked and splashed on the front page of Britain'sMail on Sunday.

The British government's first instinct was to stand behind him. But the president was "absolutely livid," John Bolton, the White House national security adviser, recalled. "He was saying, 'I want him out of here; get him out of here.' I tried to explain that when it's not our ambassador, we can't fire him." What the president could do, Bolton told him, was make it clear to the British that he wasn't happy.

Bolton called Mark Sedwill, the national security adviser for British Prime Minister Theresa May, to give him a heads-up. "I said, 'Look, this isn't going to end well,'" Bolton told him. "'You got to pull him back.'"

The ambassador acknowledged the inevitable. "The current situation is making it impossible for me to carry out my role as I would like," he said in his resignation letter.

Behind the scenes, Queen Elizabeth reached out to calm troubled waters, as she had so often before, with so many presidents.

"She couldn't believe it; she thought he was terrible," Trump said, revealing a conversation not previously reported. "I think they fired him over that, didn't they? They fired him. She said, 'He doesn't speak for our government.' Oh, she was furious over that. He was a total lightweight. He was just a guy; he was trying to be a Mr. Tough Guy."

Trump's evolving account of their conversation to me reflected the delicacy of the Queen's comments. "She apologized," Trump said at first. Then he qualified that statement, saying, "It wasn't an apology." She distanced herself and her government from Darroch's comments, but after Trump labeled the ambassador "a fool," he added, "She didn't call him a fool, but she basically indicated that he was a stupid person."

Whatever she said, it was enough.

She had calmed his ire without actually apologizing. She had made it clear she disapproved of Darroch's comments without, perhaps, throwing the ambassador himself overboard. "She didn't have to apologize," Trump said. "She didn't apologize. She just said how terrible he was to do such a thing. So it wasn't an apology. She wasn't an apologist. But what she was − a great woman."

The diplomatic deftness of a mother

In 2024, British author Craig Brown got headlines when he reported in his breezy, bestselling book, "A Voyage Around the Queen," that Elizabeth had confided to an unnamed lunch guest that she had found Trump "very rude."

There was another secondhand report of Elizabeth's opinion of the president. Monty Roberts, a famed California horse trainer who had a long and close relationship with the Queen, said in the documentary "The Cowboy and the Queen" that she had told him she didn't like Trump. She didn't like bullies, he said, mentioning Russian PresidentVladimir Putinas another example.

But Boris Johnson, an ally of Trump, disputed reports that she had been put off by him. "Seriously, I think she was amused by President Trump and liked him," the former prime minister said. "That was my impression."

That was Trump's impression, too. While she refused to answer the question when he posed it, he said he was given to understand that she had identified her favorite president to others.

It was him.

"We just got along," he said.

To be clear, it wasn't a ranking that Her Majesty revealed. Even so, Woody Johnson thought Trump was right.

"The president has a very keen sense of things like that," said Johnson, the U.S. ambassador to the United Kingdom. "It was his perception that, yeah, she was fond of him." That wouldn't have surprised Johnson, given Trump's personality and drive. "I think she recognized that Trump is a different kind of person, that's putting it mildly, and so he's not going to play by the rules. He didn't go to How-to-Be-a-President School ... and that's why he's effective."

She had hosted 113 state visits in all through her long reign; Trump's dinner was the last one.

Tourist souvenirs portraying U.S. President Donald Trump and Britain's Queen Elizabeth, are displayed in a tourist shop, during the visit by Trump and First Lady Melania Trump in London, Britain July 13, 2018. REUTERS/Kevin Coombs

Those who knew the Queen well were skeptical about the notion that Trump could have been her favorite president, whatever that meant.

Several senior officials in the palace and the British government responded with startled laughter to the idea that her relationship with him could have matched the affection she felt for some of his predecessors. Dwight Eisenhower had been a hero, and Ronald Reagan, a friend. She had met with George W. Bush more often than any other president − the only president to have the honor of state visits in both Washington and London − and her clear fondness for Barack Obama had struck officials on both sides of the Atlantic.

Perhaps Her Majesty had the gift of some mothers − to convince each of her children, without ever saying so, that he or she was her favorite. Part of her diplomatic deftness was her ability to persuade presidents that she particularly enjoyed their company. She never dissed any of them in public, not even the difficult ones. Presidents from Harry Truman to Donald Trump came away feeling that they had forged a personal bond with her.

When I asked former Prime Minister David Cameron about Trump's belief that he was the Queen's favorite president, he noted only that she was a "very good diplomat" who was "very discreet about those sorts of things."

Others thought that assessment was more telling about Trump than about the Queen. "That's hysterical," Jill Biden said asJoe Bidenshook his head. "Oh, that fits his character, for sure."

Hillary Clinton responded, "Why am I not surprised by that?" She added, "I don't think there is any evidence to believe that could possibly be true."

Bill Clinton recalled a conversation he had with Obama and Biden in 2024. "We were all joking at Ethel Kennedy's funeral about how she tried to make every Democratic president feel like he was her favorite, and she was shrewd about that, Ethel was. And Queen Elizabeth was no dummy. She knew what she was doing ..."

He would be "shocked" if Elizabeth had ever identified a favorite, Bill Clinton said. "I have no idea what she really thought of any of us. I just know ... what I thought of her, and I thought she was really special."

Susan Page is the Washington Bureau chief of USA TODAY and the best-selling author of biographies of Barbara Bush, Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Walters.

Pre-order "The Queen and Her Presidents" here.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump adored Elizabeth. Was he the Queen's favorite president?

Trump adored Elizabeth. Was he the Queen's favorite president?

Drawn from "The Queen and Her Presidents: The Hidden Hand That Shaped History," by Susan Page, to be published ...
Trump wants a border win. Will Supreme Court allow limits on asylum-seekers?

WASHINGTON – As the battle over immigration roils the country, theSupreme Courton March 24 will debate whether the federal governmentcan send back asylum-seekersat the U.S.-Mexico border.

USA TODAY

Thepractice often called ''metering"– used by Democratic and Republican administrations alike to manage the number of people who can claim asylum each day – is not being used now. But the Trump administration wants to be able to use it, calling the policy a "critical tool for addressing border surges."

The Justice Department asked theSupreme Courtto overturn a ruling that the government is required to process a claim once someone reaches a port of entry.

Immigrant rights organizations and asylum-seekers challenging the policy argue the government has used it to turn away people who are desperate,even when there's sufficient staffing and other resources to deal with them.

In a 2020 report, internal watchdogs at the Homeland Security Department said that, regardless of a port's actual capacity and capability, border patrol agents at some crossings routinely told migrants they weren't able to process them.

"This case was never about capacity," said Nicole Elizabeth Ramos of Al Otro Lado, an immigrant rights group that helped bring the initial 2017 class action lawsuit. "It was about cutting off access to a group of people that the government – specifically the president and his administration – deem undesirable."

U.S. Customs and Border Protection has said it needs flexibility to manage its varied agenda, which includes stopping drug trafficking and facilitating lawful trade and travel.

Migrants crossed the Rio Grande and approach the Texas National Guard to enquire when they will be allowed to be processed by Customs and Border Protection to seek asylum in El Paso, Texas on Dec. 20, 2022

Can the U.S. legally turn back asylum-seekers?

To be granted asylum – a process that can take years – an applicant must demonstrate they have faced persecution based on one of five protected grounds: race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group.

The 1986 Immigration and Nationality Act allows anyone "who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States" to apply for asylum.

The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appealssaidthe best way to interpret "arrives in" is that it doesn't mean the same thing as "physically present," which would be redundant.

Instead, the term "encompasses those who encounter officials at the border, whichever side of the border they are standing on," a divided panel of judges said.

Advertisement

Otherwise, the court said, the law gives migrants an incentive to try to circumvent border crossings, something Congress likely did not intend.

The Justice Department says that interpretation defies the plain text of the law.

"The ordinary meaning of 'arrives in' refers to entering a specified place, not just coming close to it," the government said in its appeal.

Border policy used in past administrations

The practice of not letting an asylum-seeker pass through a checkpoint was used periodically during the Obama administration, when border officers began turning awayhundreds of Haitian asylum-seekersat ports of entry in California.

Customs and Border Protection officers could stop undocumented migrants from physically setting foot on U.S. soil whenever they considered a border crossing too busy.

The policy was formalized during the first Trump administration, and the Biden administration lifted the policy but allowed exceptions.

As a result, immigrant rights groups say, asylum-seekers lived for months in makeshift camps on the Mexico side of the border without reliable food, shelter or safety.

Members of the CASA advocacy group hold Save Asylum signs during a press conference on Jan. 18, 2024.

Religious groups back migrants

Their lawsuit is backed by the Catholic Church and other religious organizations.

"Every major faith tradition makes protecting the stranger a core value," said Liz Theoharis, executive director at the Kairos Center for Religions, Rights, and Social Justice. "For Christians like myself, protecting and welcoming the immigrant is one of Jesus' first and most powerful teachings."

But Eric Wessan, the top appellate lawyer for the Iowa attorney general's office, said the justices probably agreed to take the case because they believe the appeals court misread the law.

"As a textual matter," he said, "I just find it really hard to believe that the Supreme Court that we have is going to interpret 'in the United States' to include people stopped outside the border that are not in the United States."

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Supreme Court debates policy of turning away asylum-seekers at border

Trump wants a border win. Will Supreme Court allow limits on asylum-seekers?

WASHINGTON – As the battle over immigration roils the country, theSupreme Courton March 24 will debate whether the federa...
Clippers turn hot shooting into 129-96 rout of Bucks, led by Leonard's 28 points

INGLEWOOD, Calif. (AP) — Kawhi Leonard scored 28 points in 25 minutes and the Los Angeles Clippers pummeled the Milwaukee Bucks 129-96 on Monday night.

Associated Press LA Clippers center Brook Lopez (11) reacts after scoring a three-pointer during the second half of an NBA basketball game against the Milwaukee Bucks, Monday, March 23, 2026, in Inglewood, Calif. (AP Photo/Caroline Brehman) LA Clippers guard Cam Christie (12) takes a shot while being guarded by Milwaukee Bucks guard Andre Jackson Jr. (44) during the second half of an NBA basketball game Monday, March 23, 2026, in Inglewood, Calif. (AP Photo/Caroline Brehman) Milwaukee Bucks head coach Doc Rivers yells out to players on the court during the first half of an NBA basketball game against the LA Clippers, Monday, March 23, 2026, in Inglewood, Calif. (AP Photo/Caroline Brehman) Milwaukee Bucks forward Bobby Portis (9) drives to the basket with the ball while being guarded by LA Clippers guard Kobe Sanders (4) during the first half of an NBA basketball game Monday, March 23, 2026, in Inglewood, Calif. (AP Photo/Caroline Brehman) Milwaukee Bucks guard Ryan Rollins (13) drives to the basket with the ball while being guarded by LA Clippers forward Kawhi Leonard (2) during the first half of an NBA basketball game Monday, March 23, 2026, in Inglewood, Calif. (AP Photo/Caroline Brehman)

Bucks Clippers Basketball

Brook Lopez added 19 points, Darius Garland had 15 points and six assists, and the Clippers won consecutive games following four straight losses. They made all 18 of their free throws and got back to .500 with 10 games remaining in the regular season after having a 6-21 record on Dec. 18.

Gary Trent Jr. paced the Bucks with 20 points off the bench. Ryan Rollins led their starters with 13, and Milwaukee had five players in double figures. The Bucks have lost 10 of their past 14 games, including three of four sincesitting superstar Giannis Antetokounmpobecause of a left knee injury.

The Clippers dominated the 3-point line at both ends of the court, making 17 of 38 shots from long range (45%) while frustrating the Bucks before they used a meaningless fourth-quarter flurry to finish at 39% (16 for 41). That included Los Angeles sinking 11 of 22 attempts in the first half, including a 7-for-12 stretch to help fuel a 43-point second quarter.

The onslaught continued into the second half as the Clippers went up by 46. Even the 7-foot-1 Lopez got in on the fun, shooting 4 of 5 on 3s in the third quarter.

Advertisement

Leonard, who sat out the entire fourth period, shook off a sluggish start to go 8 for 18 from the field and make nine foul shots. He had 16 points in the second quarter.

In his 14th NBA season, Leonard is averaging a career-high 28.3 points per game, helping push the Clippers back to an all-but-certain spot in the play-in tournament following their miserable start.

Up next

Bucks: Visit the Portland Trail Blazers on Wednesday.

Clippers: Host the Toronto Raptors on Wednesday.

AP NBA:https://apnews.com/hub/nba

Clippers turn hot shooting into 129-96 rout of Bucks, led by Leonard's 28 points

INGLEWOOD, Calif. (AP) — Kawhi Leonard scored 28 points in 25 minutes and the Los Angeles Clippers pummeled the Milwaukee...
Warriors guard Moses Moody suffers gruesome non-contact injury

TheGolden State Warriorscan't catch a break this season when it comes to the injury bug.

USA TODAY Sports

After receiving news that Stephen Curry has made "good progress," theWarriorsseemingly lose another player to injury.

Moses Moodywent down with a gruesome, apparent knee injury during the Warriors'137-131overtime win against theDallas Mavericks.

Moody got a clean steal, poking the ball away from Mavericks rookie Cooper Flagg with 1:15 remaining in the overtime period.

Advertisement

Moody was all alone on a fast break when he exploded to the rim for a dunk. It appeared his knee gave out on him, which caused him to land awkwardly. He never attempted the shot.

Moody stayed down and was carried off of the court on a stretcher. He ended the game with 23 points on 8-of-20 shooting, including four made 3s. He also added three steals and two blocks.

Moody missed the Warriors' previous 10 games with a sprained right wrist.

Social media reactions to Moody's injury

Players reacted and consoled Moody on the court as he was taken off. Many others took to social media to react to Moody's injury. Please be advised that some of the following images are graphic.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Golden State Warriors guard Moses Moody has non-contact knee injury

Warriors guard Moses Moody suffers gruesome non-contact injury

TheGolden State Warriorscan't catch a break this season when it comes to the injury bug. After rec...

 

ALPHA MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com